Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
throwaway292893
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
File a police report. Move somewhere the local government backs their police and they do their job. What you want is the ability to pay to get expedited help, to which I say is that the fair option to those who can't afford to pay for
32.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
Currently Tesla cars are the only practical EVs on the market. We'll see how the F150 pans out, but I'm more hesitant in Ford's ability to deliver than Tesla continuing to deliver.
33.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
Ah yes the standard vacationed too long safety net. There's unemployment and welfare for those who need it, not SWEs that don't want to work. Don't work safety nets into your plans, they are for people in need, you are taking
34.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
Unless you're cackling like our VP I think you're fine.
35.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
Yes, humor and laughter is a coping mechanism.
36.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
You mean social media giants are the new tobacco industry, or just Facebook specifically?
37.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
In addition to the revenue from selling cars. The GP was asking why Nvidia doesn't stop selling their cards and use them to generate bitcoin as a mining company. Tesla simply took some of their cash and invested in Bitcoin, they didn&#
38.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
Pile of trash like most of psychology today. It just interleaves some obvious things with pure conjecture. The "wiping away their sins" inferred by offering them a pencil or a cleansing wipe was just icing on the cake.
39.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
Usually the challenge isn't having to build your own economy to back the business you already built.
40.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
> I call for a trend that results in mega corporations publicizing internal procedures that have a meaningful, lasting impact on the public. I agree, but a step further, transparent moderation logs. > I also call for folks banned by T
41.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
> Different things are mashed here. Public square implies public (Gov owned) property. A Gov official that posts a comment on my blog wouldn't transform my blog into a Gov owned entity. It would be a disaster if it did because it wo
42.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
> A law that mandates that I or anyone must broadcast a politician's opinion - this is a textbook example of compelling speech. You are not Twitter or Facebook. Stop pretending these giant social behemoths are people, they are not.
43.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
> How is a state gov compelling speech by a private entity reeling anything in? That's the articles take, not mine. I don't believe it's compelling speech by preventing candidates from being banished. > They have never
44.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
> The 18 million fake comments the FCC received did not solely oppose net neutrality. The 19-year-old college student cited in the report submitted 7.7 million comments in favor of net neutrality. Maybe have some sort of verification and
45.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
I guess we will see, but I welcome the change. I'm glad someone is doing something to reel these social media giants in. I'd like to see transparent moderation logs first and foremost. These billion dollar companies are not immune
46.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
Considering that it was mostly overturned in Brandenburg v. Ohio, SCOTUS agreed that it was unconstitutional and overreaching. They held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting
47.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
The shouting fire being illegal is a myth. The court case was about the Espionage Act of 1917, and was extremely unconstitutional. It was about speaking about against the draft. Holmes justified his ruling with the fire statement at the end
48.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
That's not my experience, I mostly see teens and sometimes one or two adults. Do you have a source backing up that claim? > We should be spending money creating new, better paying jobs, not new social programs.
49.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
I do too, but currently the opposite logic is being applied to unemployment benefits. Maybe there will be an article about those shady defense contracts and eco projects but that's not the topic.
50.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
You shouldn't be able to "choose to not be employed", someone else is picking up the slack for you and you are taking away benefits that could be used on someone that NEEDS it (disability, elderly, etc.) When others see that
51.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
No, the full blame goes to the near slave farms exploiting these people. Raise the prices if you have to and tell the consumers to shove it. Chipotle just did this, farms can do it. If you can't survive without slave labor don't s
52.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
That's crazy, no. people are lazy and will be lazy if you give them the option. There's plenty of jobs available. No jobs are unavailable due to covid restrictions. Burnouts playing video games is not new to the pandemic, the only
53.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
I'm speaking for me and those I know. My response was to GP saying everyone is happy. I am not. Also, I'm not talking about the people who need support, I'm talking about the people taking advantage and staying on unemploymen
54.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
Well I'm not. Now there's two anecdotes to work with. I worked a shitty job to get through college, it's a stepping stone. These jobs aren't meant to live on. They should be used as part time jobs for people transitionin
55.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
Those exploited immigrants won't hold their breath. I'm sure those farms unwilling to pay a fair wage will start investing in those expensive machines' R&D. Then do it for all other crops.
56.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
The people with jobs paying taxes aren't very happy to support freeloaders simply taking unemployment because they don't want to work.
57.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
Looking at you California farms.
58.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
Ridiculous. I love menthols, I don't smoke often but when I do have one those. If it's true that a lot of black people smoke them like the article and FDA suggest, I assume they will be quite pissed. Guess I'll smoke cowboy k
59.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
Correct, updated. Main point still stands.
60.
▲
by
throwaway292893
5y ago
15,000 counts of manslaughter, plus obstruction of justice for the cover up.
More ›