throwaway2048

11 ms·

91.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
that has nothing to do with sshd's listening socket, which remains owned by root
92.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
you cant block the actual port bind, but you can block any packets from reaching it, so the difference is mostly semantics
93.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
Its pretty trivial to disable the ability of users to listen on certain ports higher than 1024 with a firewall config.
94.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
Its not about stopping brainless botnets from actually logging in with root:toor 9 million times, its about removing clutter from your logs so you can more easily tell when something actually dangerous is happening.
95.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
Nobody is talking about excluding Thiel from investing in Saudi Arabia, or forfeiting his right to safety or privacy. What is being questioned here is the narrative that Gawker put him in any kind of serious risk wrt Saudi Arabia, or that h
96.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
Where is all the concern involving the fact that Peter Thiel was investing in a regime where there is a death penalty for being gay in the first place, why does that get a pass and all the concern falls on his supposed personal safety. This
97.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
They also remove almost all the supposed decentralization and trustless model benefits of bitcoin
98.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
I very much doubt close to 100% of companies have issued apologies to china
99.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
Plenty of countries that have simple majoritarian systems, even on what the USA would consider constitutional issues haven't fallen to tyranny.
100.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
It is not a 25% population requirement, its a 5% one, that is, you only need 5% of voters to vote for your party in senate seats effective hold onto a majority proof veto. The senate is fundamentally an anti-democratic rule-by-minority inst
101.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
Every new car has GPS tracking and cellular antennas in them and has for almost a decade.
102.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
So in other words, you believe that people protesting in the street deserve to die.
103.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
approximately nobody defines open source as "you can see the source but you aren't free to fork it or modify it" This is not the conventional meaning of the term, and has repeatedly been used as an avenue to attack the concep
104.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
Better in what sense? Its extremely difficult to actually use cryptocurrency for selling things beyond cryptocurrency related instruments. You need both your vendors and your customers to be able to easily transfer money in and out, and as
105.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
That says more about the profession of "Programmer" vs "Lawyer" than it does about some imagined hypocrisy.
106.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
its trivial to add, yet hasn't been added in almost 15 years, it is very much a title text search and nothing about this move indicates otherwise. there is no economic interest from google to make ad free apps actually findable, and no
107.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
you might even say most software is ruined by NOT having ads, I wish everything had even more ads, I say!
108.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
Apples CPU design is absolutely an APU, I advise knowing what the market actually looks like before constantly posting.
109.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
40 billion isn't much to sabotage the vast majority of your competitors
110.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
Huh? Apple doesn't own ARM either, and have a GPU with an ARM CPU, Nvidia has an architectural license just like Apple does.
111.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
And nvidia can keep making tegra, even without buying out ARM
112.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
the rising tide has stopped lifting all boats decades ago.
113.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
Its almost like different people have different opinions or something.
114.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
take a picture of it
115.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
Its not resulting in housing being built, its resulting in existing stock getting bought and flipped.
116.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
Its not hard to understand at all, they willingly screw over customers, just look at all the posters here falling all over themselves to excuse this blatantly shitty customer hostile behavior.
117.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
that still has nothing to do with consumer choice, and is entirely about revenue maximization for canon. It is not somehow magically enabling a greater degree of choice.
118.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
Intel similarly recorded record smashing profits while destroying its R&D and tons of its future potential, and AMD and ARM are now a very serious problem for them. Its entirely possible to post a few years of crazy profits while tankin
119.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
this sort of "choice" is essentially entirely meaningless, if camera features were software unlock based they could sell all cameras with all features for the lowest price and still make money, the only one benefiting here is cano
120.
by throwaway2048 5y ago
assuming you only travel to places with good internet and a nearby stadia server

More ›