4 ms·
It is not a 25% population requirement, its a 5% one, that is, you only need 5% of voters to vote for your party in senate seats effective hold onto a majority
by throwaway2048 5y ago
It is not a 25% population requirement, its a 5% one, that is, you only need 5% of voters to vote for your party in senate seats effective hold onto a majority proof veto.
The senate is fundamentally an anti-democratic rule-by-minority institution that represents land area over top of human beings.
Its as serious as a problem some other democracies and polities have faced
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotten_and_pocket_boroughs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotten_and_pocket_boroughs
In the UK it almost caused a revolution, because it allowed the wealthy and corrupt to hold onto power, while denying representation to new cities with huge population.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sejm_of_the_Polish%E2%80%93Lithuanian_Commonwealth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sejm_of_the_Polish%E2%80%93Lit...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberum_veto https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberum_veto
In the Polish Lithuanian commonwealth every senator held veto power, in practice this meant that an insane amount of corruption occurred (including senators being bought off by foreign nations), and it totally neutered their power as a state to fend of military rivals, and eventually ended up with the nation conquered.
The senate is in desperate need of reform, and is a key part of why democracy is failing in the USA.
- d0gsg0w00f 5y agoDemocracy is failing because we have two sides that have fundamentally different ideas for what our nation should be. Do we want high individual economic mobility (up and down) or do we want want to bring everyone up/down to a common level?
- stormbrew 5y agoI don't think either of those positions are represented in any way by the two political party choices Americans have. In the case of the former, it seems pretty blatantly to be empty rhetoric - the Republican Party as it exists now is built by and for established wealth to maintain established wealth. In the case of the latter, the Democrats do not even pretend to advocate for anything like that. The only people who think they represent that are the people who don't vote for them.