throwaway14356

9 ms·

61.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
Having a fixed path for a search api is a great idea.
62.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
ive never implemented it but it should be possible to check if content still lives behind the url where it was originally found before serving any kind of archived copy.(preferably with contact info for the unwilling author) Using it for a
63.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
on the outside are people who could make websites but cant see the point of it. They are on Reddit on facebook on hn on twitter on youtube or they just don't bother. On platforms they make very crappy low effort content (with unearned
64.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
> Google has built a massive index of the internet that covers close to 100% of the accessible web. While their index (of other peoples stuff) is enormous it far from includes everything. It is easy to disqualify and people would be scre
65.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
Assuming you want to get rid of the fees entirely: people will have to look at the spam and divide it into more and less spammy. Others will have to do the same with the less spammy and so on. Eventually there is room for more accomplished
66.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
Religions also attempt to explain the universe. The problem begins when new theories, new observations and new stories can no longer be added. It must after all support some form of acceptance initially. The edge science is suppose to have
67.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
So scientists created this new publishing platform called the www but other scientists with no such expertise pretend it hurts their reputation to use it? That seems rather comical. Do they perhaps have a constructive argument to offer? If
68.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
you aren't wrong but i do think an organization that large with that many customers and attention from many more should be able to make and sell useful products to the world. Simply forcing people to pay is a rather crude and unsophist
69.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
I want to see different file types with their own rendering engines and/or programming languages in the same browsers. Very powerful but also very limited languages and formats that know what their purpose is.
70.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
would it be possible to just work on writing everything down and use all the time it takes? I imagine the complicated part would grow wordy enough to stick out like a sore thumb. Perhaps eventually have a freelancer turn it into technical d
71.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
haha, no man, the "creativity" cargo cult should be entirely ignored. You shouldn't even consider what mechanistic formula they've invented. If you do you might buy into it and your creativity will be less your own. Neve
72.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
i use to be that guy telling people not to put their eggs in other peoples basket. Some laughed at me for a decade, almost convincingly and then... Of course my stuff also breaks because you cant really do anything anymore without trusting
73.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
if only we had secure computing devices. Imagine a useful application of blockchain. A historic first :p
74.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
if you buy something it shouldn't be tied to their backend either. I use to type the ip from a security cam and get a web page with a video stream on it. I thought it was hilarious when it turned into a 404.
75.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
It struck me once that the elections every 4 years was pretty ambitious for that time. Today the delay doesn't seem required. Have people change their vote when they like with a min max to take and leave office. The greeks had ostracis
76.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
while we use it a lot apple is not our tech market.
77.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
Seems a noble plan but you will always have some good and some bad players. The form does matter as you can set things in stone to safeguard and make it impossible for future generations to rule themselves. I think we can pay people to stud
78.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
my theory is that we have to keep repeating this until a stable formula is found. It probably wont be any good but i think given enough time it will happen. if we excessively simplify the problem is people acting in their own interest rathe
79.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
$6.1 trillion 2023 seems 500b per month?
80.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
i see what you mean. I couldn't imagine using fake tables for layout. you use grid flex or even float (if you need L or Z shaped cells)
81.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
they did this ten to a billionth thing where everyone got to submit ideas. They hired an army to look at it all before it went into the incinerator. Im kinda curious what machine learning or llms could make from such a dataset. If enough pe
82.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
why would they even be companies? Not sure if true but i read a funny: bezos entire fortune could keep the pentagon afloat for 2 whole weeks.
83.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
Not very unexpected.
84.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
one is a table the other pretends to be a table. There has to be a lot wrong for the table to forget what it is. try disabling style. css also gets complicated much faster than html. I like to offload complexity to less complicated areas. a
85.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
the internet use to be a series of tubes, now it is a series of buckets.
86.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
on one of the first horizontal iron beams of a new suppermarkt, 3 meter up, sits a cup from a construction worker. I see him put it there. 8 years later it still sits there, in front of the window. The cleaners don't bother with it. Wh
87.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
i use to play with the idea to provide books, a bed, laundry and food for free. Periodic tests serve only to throw you out. Nothing fancy, a basic meal. If you want to sleep eat and read for 50 years that should be fine. If there is no burn
88.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
should increasing demand increase prices?
89.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
make one?
90.
by throwaway14356 2y ago
I didn't think it was fun or original but as i was checking boxes anyway for reasons beyond me i got annoyed someone else unchecked them.

More ›