Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
throwaway0123_5
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
8mo ago
> 3d graphics Seems like the G in GPU is very obsolete now: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-h100-benchmarkedin-... > As it turns out Nvidia's H100, a card that costs over $30,000 performs worse than
32.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
8mo ago
> you'll also end up with scores of people who "correctly" followed the signals right up until the signals went away. I think this is where we're headed, very quickly, and I'm worried about it from a social stabi
33.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
8mo ago
LLMs and AI more broadly certainly seem to have upended (or have the potential to upend) a lot of white-collar work outside of technology and art. Translators are one obvious example. Lawyers might be on the chopping block if they don'
34.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
8mo ago
Yeah, I notice a lot of the optimism is from people who have been in the field for decades. I'm newish to the field, half a decade out of undergrad. It definitely feels like almost all of what I learned has been (or will soon be) compl
35.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
8mo ago
On iOS Safari it loads and works decent for me, but w/ iOS Firefox and Firefox Focus doesn't even load.
36.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
8mo ago
> But I think we're still a long way off non-technical people being able to develop applications. I'm surprised I haven't seen anyone do a case study, having truly non-technical people build apps with these tools. Take a f
37.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
9mo ago
> Claude Opus 4.5 in a casual Claude Code session, approximately matching the best human performance in 2 hours Is this saying that Claude matched the best human performance, where the human had two hours? I think that is the correct rea
38.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
9mo ago
> Someone could be taking this position in this situation because they're highly skeptical that the Americans involved in this have the ability or desire to proceed in a way that will result in a minimum of casualities or in a way t
39.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
10mo ago
Given what I understand about the nature of competitive programming competitions, using an LLM seems kind of like using a calculator in an arithmetic competition (if such a thing existed) or a dictionary in a spelling bee.
40.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
11mo ago
This is also why I'm skeptical of claims that it would be impossible (or nearly so) for governments to meaningfully regulate AI R&D/deployment (regardless of whether or not they should ). The "you can't regulate m
41.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
11mo ago
I think you're overestimating how much real damage someone can cause with burpsuite and "a few youtube videos." I'd imagine if you pick a random person off the street, subject them to a full month's worth of cyberse
42.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
11mo ago
If they're truly Chinese state-sponsored actors, does it really matter if their actions/methods are exposed? What is Anthropic going to do, send the Anthropic Police Force to China to arrest them? I suppose I could see this argume
43.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
11mo ago
This definition makes sense, but in the context of LLMs it still feels misapplied. What the model providers call "guardrails" are supposed to prevent malicious uses of the LLMs, and anyone trying to maliciously use the LLM is &q
44.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
11mo ago
> I'd really hate to see the world go down the path of gatekeeping tools behind something like ID or career verification. This is already done for medicine, law enforcement, aviation, nuclear energy, mining, and I think some biologi
45.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
11mo ago
Are you saying this because you think that people should still try to learn things for personal interest in a world where AI makes learning things to make money pointless (I agree completely, though what I spend time learning would change),
46.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
1y ago
> So like these are less serious issues if you are paid an extra $1-200k/ year Ok but to be fair most people in the US aren't making "extra $1-200k / year" over a person in Europe. They aren't even making $1
47.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
1y ago
Making all of those things cheaper is great, as long the automation isn't also making everyone poorer at an equal or faster rate. It doesn't really help if house prices and food prices are cut in half if most people lose their emp
48.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
1y ago
I don't disagree. Social/economic stratification (to a certain degree) makes sense as long as there is a reasonable amount of social mobility. AGI paired with advanced robotics seems as though it would all but eliminate social mob
49.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
1y ago
I think the problem is if/when AGI enables "someone else" to not need human employees for ~anything. The people that own physical capital (land, farms, mines, etc.) would have robots and GPT-N to extract value from it. The pe
50.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
1y ago
Is the suggestion that AGI (or even current AI) lowers the barrier of entry to making a company so much that regular people can just create a company in order to make money (and then buy food/shelter)? If so, I think there's a lot
51.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
1y ago
Lets say I have a robot or two with a genius-level intellect. In theory it could manufacture a car for me or cook my dinner or harvest the crops needed for my dinner. But I don't own the mine where the metals needed to make a car come
52.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
1y ago
I don't see how owning a robot helps me with obtaining the essentials of life in this scenario. There's no reason for a corporation to hire my robot if it has its own robots and can make/power them more efficiently with econo
53.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
1y ago
In terms of quality of life, much/most of the value of intelligence is in how it lets you affect the physical world. For most knowledge workers, that takes the form of using intelligence to increase how productively some physical asset
54.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
1y ago
> plus there is all the energy needed for me to live in a modern civilization and make the source material available to me for learning (schools, libraries, internet) To be fair, this is true of LLMs too, and arguably more true for them
55.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
1y ago
Anti-AI shill? A cofounder of OpenAI?
56.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
1y ago
The only place I commonly see escalators besides these places is airports, I don't think they've expanded that much?
57.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
1y ago
I'm a heavy Notion user and haven't once used the AI features. I use AI on a near-daily basis outside Notion, but it just isn't something I need from Notion. On the other hand at least it isn't that intrusive in Notion u
58.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
1y ago
Not quite enough random capital letters for me.
59.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
1y ago
Their point still stands though? They said the 1 tok/hr example was illustrative only. 11,000 LoC could be generated line-by-line in one shot, taking not much more than 11,000 * avg_tokens_per_line tokens. Or the model could be embedde
60.
▲
by
throwaway0123_5
1y ago
If the program being cut is valuable, I would say absolutely. Ignoring that this website is obviously going to have massive bias, a huge amount of the savings listed are for programs I would generally support: Health services, health resear
More ›