throwaway-m3232

5 ms·

1.
by throwaway-m3232 4y ago
Oh, so YJIT is highly coupled to x86-64? Porting GCC + yjit is less work than porting GCC + yjit + LLVM.
2.
by throwaway-m3232 4y ago
Why not C++, for better portability? If I want to design my own CPU, I will have to add it to GCC. But Rust is LLVM so if I want to support Ruby-jit on my CPU, I will also will have to support LLVM.
3.
by throwaway-m3232 4y ago
When I see someone mention human nature in some blog, I stop reading... Human nature is our species ability to transform nature. A cat, for example, is only doing hunting for immediate consumption. A pet cat is even more limited, just a fur
4.
by throwaway-m3232 5y ago
Ah, some stupid Silicon valley bullshit. Programming and many more things done there, is not work. Yeah, it looks like work, but it is not, it does not produce something necessary for biological living or education or life support. It is mo
5.
by throwaway-m3232 5y ago
Yes, I too think that GDP growth goal is not very compatible with sustainable production. But not to the point where you have less kinds of food. But the main problem I think is: there is no option to work less. Lets say you want to consume
6.
by throwaway-m3232 5y ago
I think there is a contradiction: on one hand, consumption should be reduced for sustainable production. But I have not heard anything on reducing the work time. I do not think that there can be a consensus that asks to work more for less.
7.
by throwaway-m3232 5y ago
>3) income Hm, I know some obvious contradictions. Just saying.. not interested in discussing this.