throwa990323249

3 ms·

1.
by throwa990323249 11y ago
The paper addresses that directly: "Thus, while our proof of RH might look too short to be true, it really involves at least two rather long papers [6, 8], not to mention [9]."
2.
by throwa990323249 11y ago
Actually that doesn't dereference a nil. https://play.golang.org/p/cjmflMBhF7 Why not learn the language before criticizing it?
3.
by throwa990323249 11y ago
>The language itself not much. It doesn't offer anything new that Java 1.0 with Quasar doesn't already have. It offers lots of abstractions Java didn't/doesn't: Lots of concurrency features, Ad hoc interfaces, Cl
4.
by throwa990323249 11y ago
Chicken and egg... But if there was good Python 3 support maybe more companies would contribute.
5.
by throwa990323249 11y ago
I too want 3.3+ support but I know some claim that there's very little demand from people actually doing something with PyPy for Python 3 support. I really think it may be a chicken and egg problem: that is, support will generate deman
6.
by throwa990323249 11y ago
ARC languages are Turing complete, but some algorithms require more than just "peppering weakrefs" and actually require you to essentially build your own GC.
7.
by throwa990323249 11y ago
Your "confidence" is wrong. Consider a graph which can have nodes added, and edges added or removed. Say you want to keep track of the part of the graph that is connected to a node. You can't know ahead of time which referenc
8.
by throwa990323249 11y ago
ARC won't work when you cannot determine ahead of time where the cycle can end safely. Pretty sure for an interesting set of algorithms this is a problem. It's something I find annoying about some ARC/Rust enthusiasts: their