throwAGIway

13 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by throwAGIway 2y ago

   Blue Origin is newspace, isn't it? It's definitely a big outlier among LM, NG, Boeing etc...
2. 122.▲
   by throwAGIway 2y ago

   Yeah, a day job. I'm not in the US and there are no such quant positions that would accept me remotely and/or pay more than the remote-only US corporate job I have. But I'd probably avoid it even if I was in the US, I don&#x2
3. 123.▲
   by throwAGIway 2y ago

   I started to make much more money by just spending the same amount of time writing enterprise software. HFTs made it very hard to find a moat in technical trading, I don't believe you can beat them at their own game today; I especially
4. 124.▲
   by throwAGIway 2y ago

   It's influenced by the population wave caused by a communist president in early 1970s. The results are subpar if you normalize for that. There are a lot more adults in the age to have children right now than before, but it's going
5. 125.▲
   by throwAGIway 2y ago

   Is there a single place anywhere on Earth where it doesn't suck for somebody there?
6. 126.▲
   by throwAGIway 2y ago

   As I said, nowadays it's not working so well. I wouldn't do it - saying this as a former trader that used it successfully (15-20% returns p.a.) for more than a decade, but 20 years ago. Today I don't daytrade at all, just som
7. 127.▲
   by throwAGIway 2y ago

   It's called Drive Pilot and the user experience of activation and usage is no different from a Tesla. It's just much less capable.
8. 128.▲
   by throwAGIway 2y ago

   Technical indicators work because they work. Really - it works because other traders decided there are price points of significance based on mathematical equations and act on it. Traditional technical analysis could be seen as looking for a
9. 129.▲
   by throwAGIway 2y ago

   It's called Drive Pilot.
10. 130.▲
    by throwAGIway 2y ago

    I drove the Mercedes with officially regulated L2 self driving capability and it was much worse than the old Tesla model I tested years before... The current version is supposedly much further based on the online feedback, while the Mercede
11. 131.▲
    by throwAGIway 2y ago

    > keep Musk out of things Never heard that from people at Tesla or SpaceX.
12. 132.▲
    by throwAGIway 2y ago

    I don't want to counter it. They have their opinion and that's fine, I don't agree nor disagree. I'm trying to say that we don't need any further advances in the science of ML or computers - we could already do it
13. 133.▲
    by throwAGIway 2y ago

    I truly don't think it does. AGI - a human level generally intelligent agent - is possible with today's technology. It'd take a lot of classical programming work - definitely man-centuries, but even if nothing new comes out a