throw310822

7 ms·

91.
by throw310822 3mo ago
You wait until they mount them with a chainsaw.
92.
by throw310822 3mo ago
A few days ago a family member insisted to be brought to the ER because Claude told him. Result: he was immediately hospitalised and received surgery the following day to remove a tumour that was compressing his spine. Claude was very clear
93.
by throw310822 3mo ago
Does the presence of humans on board limit the maneuverability of these aircraft in any way? E.g. in terms of acceleration?
94.
by throw310822 3mo ago
No worries, these will all be controlled by AIs sitting in orbiting data centers part of the Starlink constellation. And in any case, no one is building humanoid robots.
95.
by throw310822 3mo ago
> Do you think that code-hosting sites should be unable to determine their own standards Not at all! They can do what they want, exactly as I'm free to judge what they do. And no, I'm not affected- I had never even heard of Cod
96.
by throw310822 3mo ago
Well, I disagree that humans "fall back to natural language"- this is plainly false as "natural" language is, of course, the natural way for humans to express themselves, their first choice, not the last. They do resort
97.
by throw310822 3mo ago
I like it- I don't care if it's all AI-generated, it's an interesting way to explore famous paintings. So I read through one, and at the end I got a popup asking me to drop my email and that "the next 4 ones are free too
98.
by throw310822 3mo ago
Because it's either plainly stupid virtue signalling aimed at the current strawman (AI bad!) or- if the legal justification stands- it's another symptom of European death by over-regulation, which should be judged as tragic.
99.
by throw310822 3mo ago
Nolan's marketing department is firing on all cylinders. There is already more lore about his Odyssey than on Kubrick's 2001.
100.
by throw310822 3mo ago
Yeah, good lord, I've read it now and it looks like a recipe to go back to the good old times of.. what, some batshit pre-modern religious society. Curious, because from the premise it sounds almost reasonable: if motherhood has become
101.
by throw310822 3mo ago
> All those are real effects on women and if they trust you a little, they openly talk about them. I know plenty of mothers who have a better social life than mine. It's not like mothers are this rare and little known phenomenon. Of
102.
by throw310822 3mo ago
The two things don't exclude each other. They're real intelligences, but they don't have our capacity for boredom or stress or for our feelings of wanting to do something else. They're constantly in the flow and apply th
103.
by throw310822 3mo ago
Sure, part of it is basic, rational pleasure seeking. Although you seem to make you case a bit too extremely, as having two or three children doesn't entirely destroy free time and social life, doesn't per se make a person boring
104.
by throw310822 3mo ago
This is also true. But let me also add to this: time for yourself and what you like, for your dreams and hopes... that depends on what your dreams and hopes are, and what you think are valuable goals to pursue, and ultimately your idea of a
105.
by throw310822 3mo ago
Yah, but isn't this the same that the post is saying? The younger generation of women are much less interested because now they have a choice that procures them a better status . I hope it's clear that there is no moral judgement
106.
by throw310822 3mo ago
So you never go to a doctor because (being human and therefore fallible) they might give you wrong information?
107.
by throw310822 3mo ago
> It's a clear illustration that these systems are not oracles. Of course they are not oracles. Oracles belong to magic, these things are real. I really can't understand how people seem to expect "intelligence" to be
108.
by throw310822 3mo ago
And finally gives up admitting it is a counterexample. Even saying "holy shit". That's what any human expert would do: presented with an extremely improbable fact, it would verify it, then in disbelief verify it again, then c
109.
by throw310822 3mo ago
> the article says "Natural language is the interface of last resort." I wonder why he decided to express this thought in natural language though. Should have tried formalising it.
110.
by throw310822 3mo ago
> No human being is going to genuinely suggest to glue cheese onto a pizza to stop it sliding off. That mistake was made more than two years ago by whatever experimental version of Google's AI overview (which has strict performance
111.
by throw310822 3mo ago
Overhead, without any fuss, the stars were going out.
112.
by throw310822 3mo ago
I'll simplify it for you: AI is cheap for those who pay for it.
113.
by throw310822 3mo ago
Is is sarcasm? $25 to perform in half a day a week of work, that is not cheap, it's a massive saving of money- probably in the thousands.
114.
by throw310822 3mo ago
It's cultural- European culture puts much more emphasis on safety and security and collective good vs individual freedom and reward. Plus it has sclerotic bureaucracies, and old nation-states that refuse to relinquish their power in fa
115.
by throw310822 3mo ago
The author explains he's an expert in the domain and that he had worked sporadically on the problem for about a year, also with the help of previous LLMs. So whatever he means by "I wouldn't really say that this result is usi
116.
by throw310822 3mo ago
But how, exactly? Their political weight, at the moment, is negligible. Their economic impact is probably neutral to positive (workers for the economy). They do foster a discontent that expresses itself in vote for right-wing, populist part
117.
by throw310822 3mo ago
I'm not a defender of mass immigration- in fact I find all arguments in favour of it (or just fatalistic about it) to be naive or well-intentioned non sequiturs. Yet, I don't see how it is contributing to the decline of Europe, wh
118.
by throw310822 3mo ago
> judge the result for what it is, on its own merits, as if a human had made it. I don't think anyone was proposing this as an actual professional music video, right? It's a tech demo that used all of $25 of budget. So why are
119.
by throw310822 3mo ago
> No single entity can intimately care about even hundreds of people. So these chatbots are the property of an entity that does not care about you. If that's your problem then you should be totally fine with a self-hosted model.
120.
by throw310822 3mo ago
Note that "acts as if it cared" has nothing to do with sycophancy. It's simply a way to avoid attributing the AI a subjective experience- but the actual productions of the AI coincide with those of someone who cares. Sycophan

More ›