throughaweigh

5 ms·

1.
by throughaweigh 6y ago
<Replying to rayiner's comment as sibling because of comment depth limit.> I don't know anything about what legal writing requires. Journalism requires editing and making calls about how to fairly and coherently convey quote
2.
by throughaweigh 6y ago
Legal documents have different standards, I explained why I thought the meaning was the same. When there are concrete refutations we can actually discuss them and each come to our own conclusion. But even if we take this case as journalisti
3.
by throughaweigh 6y ago
To demonstrate an obvious pattern you need to give a set of important examples. Of course you can find selective misquoting and distortions, but that doesn't establish a pattern, much less a pattern for important cases. (But even if th
4.
by throughaweigh 6y ago
I'm trying to quit posting here. I don't have any link to journalism if that's what you are asking. But there shouldn't be any effort involved if all of this is already as obvious as claimed.
5.
by throughaweigh 6y ago
What are specific examples?
6.
by throughaweigh 6y ago
> God I would love to see what you'd come up with as an example of this. @jason on Twitter said so explicitly in the last 24 hours, pg said so on Twitter some time ago. The rest of your comment just illustrates my initial point: ab
7.
by throughaweigh 6y ago
The rich and powerful attack those who attack their interests, but now they are more unified. Notice that there is actually very little concrete criticism of the media, instead you get abstract assertions ("hit piece", "fake