thro1

7 ms·

31.
by thro1 1y ago
I think that's good example ( you can easy study yourself - as he did practice enough - mostly Chopin, as a child, then jazz): Leszek Możdżer - Piano ( - Exploris, .. ) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOicB0vcbf8&
32.
by thro1 1y ago
- but isn't the universe converting time into space ? (we don't see the speed of light as changing ?)
33.
by thro1 1y ago
Shallow FUD tactic ?? " The feature is often the source of significant security issues. " (how often ? - I see ONE potential security issue there, so long since a month ?) " Browsers currently support a ~25 year old version o
34.
by thro1 1y ago
(now I see it, obviously, you does not seem to know what you are talking about - in any case, just.. can you live and let others live too ? Thx.)
35.
by thro1 1y ago
But JS can't do things in the way XSLT so far still can, transparently etc. operating at differrent level ( e.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45000600 )
36.
by thro1 1y ago
Chrome mostly can do anything Firefox can do since removing its " legacy extensions ", so Firefox has to remove XSLT too - as Google can't afford it being not helpful for tracking - and can compete only with its JS engine - s
37.
by thro1 1y ago
for documents, stylesheets are enough, KISS. no, it don't wont :) that's the point --- WWW made of interlinked documents, yet making it to be interlinked code too.. may not last, as codes like changing and finding new ways. Fancy
38.
by thro1 1y ago
I'm sorry to hear that. Other level no JS solution for this - without "after" - but with caching, using XSL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41104845 Currently it looks like at least Firefox and Chromiu
39.
by thro1 1y ago
All downvoted ? If not performance of [ONE] feature like JS engine, what would make Chrome better ? (crippling others). JS is used so much only because all other options are kept broken (since Microsoft JS XMLHttpRequest - for applicati
40.
by thro1 1y ago
> The real reason for the removal is that Google, a profit seeking corporation, considers XSLT to be unprofitable. > Of course, they can't say this out loud, so they instead have @mfreed7 cherry-pick some numbers as justificat
41.
by thro1 1y ago
Chrome is outcompeting (or cripling) Firefox - in taking control from the user, payed by the user - right now, with your comment all backward (and catch 22, cross-browser functionality bugs never to be fixed).
42.
by thro1 1y ago
Yes. That's the right solution for the even playground regarding the situation: Gecko currently has much deeper integration of the XSLT engine with the browser internals: The XSLT engine operates on the browser DOM implementation. Web
43.
by thro1 1y ago
Gecko currently has much deeper integration of the XSLT engine with the browser internals: The XSLT engine operates on the browser DOM implementation. WebKit and Chromium integrate with libxslt in a way that's inherently bad for perfo
44.
by thro1 1y ago
> Why wouldn't the overworked/underresourced Safari and Firefox people want an excuse to have less work to do? Because otherwise everybody has to repeat same work again and again, programming how - instead of focusing on what,
45.
by thro1 1y ago
> But SPAs came about in the days of jQuery, not React. (viper.pl 2000, philips.pl 2001 .. - are.. ' unreal ' ?? 'µloJSON': https://web.archive.org/web/20020702120539js_/http://www
46.
by thro1 1y ago
Federal officials in 2014 paused 18 projects before releasing 2017 guidelines that allowed work to move forward. But the debate flared again during the COVID-19 pandemic, when some scientists and Republican politicians, including Trump, al
47.
by thro1 1y ago
Who are that people saying engineers were wrong ? - for sure they are not competent. Satisfying all the constraints ? - well done, difficult, but great work ! And nice bridge - good to have, task finished. Better access is something that ca
48.
by thro1 1y ago
another one: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43859977 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43846663 HN seems to be fine with that (!).
49.
by thro1 1y ago
as we approach the potential singularity, the size of the universe changes as a (hyperbolic) function of cosmic time Glad to hear that. I'm looking forward to any theories how to convert time to space (and back) ..with orthogonal uni
50.
by thro1 1y ago
Good for him ? First, I thought the AI was materializing her projections - but actually, she chose to relate with ChatGPT (!) in conspiring against him - which obviously must have to take advantage of that opportunity and some leaves chains
51.
by thro1 1y ago
Warning. This thread spread misinformation. And most of comments here (unknowingly?) validate some fake reality, with HN reputation. What Memex is indeed (not fake): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memex . Moreover, what
52.
by thro1 1y ago
It's confabulated. (With AI?) - The missing word is: transclusion . Actually, what we have here instead: memex.tech as a simulacrum of the Memex Opposite . What Memex is indeed (not fake): https://en.wikipedia.org/w
53.
by thro1 1y ago
To be precise (reminding HN is a trust source, with respects): Memex is not a Claude Code alternative. Memex is not built on Rust+Tauri. And: Memex is not for vibe coding (!). Memex is the opposite of what memex.tech say it is what looks l
54.
by thro1 2y ago
What about black hole new mass/energy converting into orthogonal space ??? ( ..is it part of Principia Unitas ??).
55.
by thro1 2y ago
.. moreover the soft machine is (evolving) DNA expression under factors , ..with many other hidden wonders including being able to operate with even more abstract factors (transcendency), about self and cosmos.
56.
by thro1 2y ago
I think he just mean not Soft Machine kind - self *, alive without any adv. magic.
57.
by thro1 2y ago
..and tricks: somatic mutation in single human neurons tracks developmental and transcriptional _history_ (:history track), every neuron in the brain has unique DNA and ancestorship (costly, think possibilities: tree indexing schemes, D
58.
by thro1 2y ago
I consider it being a reminder since beginning. (And the knowledge self being alive by memetics - then dead and profaned in LLM, like not yet, but "to become" Frankenstain's monster.)
59.
by thro1 2y ago
LLM are data and fixed . The Intelligence I see more like a process (..having knowledge .., ways to "think" ). There would be no "hype around AI technologies" and less misunderstanding if we call it according to
60.
by thro1 2y ago
> What does this mean? A better vaccine? New mutations (since some chronic, immunocompromised unable to clean the infection patient will get it).

More ›