Chrome mostly can do anything Firefox can do since removing its "legacy extensions", so Firefox has to remove XSLT too - as Google can't afford it being not hel

Chrome mostly can do anything Firefox can do since removing its "legacy extensions", so Firefox has to remove XSLT too - as Google can't afford it being not helpful for tracking - and can compete only with its JS engine - so XSLT, if to stay, could in the future only be reimplemented in JS polyfills no more, making it less useful, not cached, not transparent - to let Chrome 'outcompete' others again, race to the bottom, everything looks like a nail. Hopefully that could be enough to complete the evidence to split Google into pieces in antitrust case - or realizing that will make Google to back off ?