thraway23

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by thraway23 9y ago

   This is pure rethoric on your side and not addressing actual stated question: how thigs would go better without subsidies. This is such a leaping sledge of hand at first, then a misleading argument (not that part of EU policy) and then difu
2. 2.▲
   by thraway23 9y ago

   That doesn't have anything to do with subsidies, and at most indirectly depends on unrelated parts of protectionist agricultural policy i.e. tariffs. Then how the EU is anyhow responsible for predatory industries in Argentina? And how
3. 3.▲
   by thraway23 9y ago

   How are EU subsidies funding destruction of rainforests? And why in your, as you say, opinion the EU is on a good path? Does it have something to do with #Covfefe?
4. 4.▲
   by thraway23 9y ago

   Unrecognized right is still a right, just a breached one. That's why the whole concept of breach exists that is separate from enforcement. Distinction you posit is in fact between a priviledge and a right. Priviledges are bestowed by a
5. 5.▲
   by thraway23 9y ago

   Your argument is I think from their playbook. They claim the same with their constitution. We hear it is being violated. Government asserts there is in fact a debate amongst experts on whehter this really happens. Then we look into that and
6. 6.▲
   by thraway23 9y ago

   Where do you (and who are you to tell) put the treshold of number of people who have to agree with someone's right? If some mob me on the street, and I'm outnumbered, do I loose my rights in this kind of "vote"? What abo