thrawa1235432

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by thrawa1235432 2y ago

   Potato potato. Familiarize yourself with their history and then your opinion might differ
2. 2.▲
   by thrawa1235432 2y ago

   The RDA and nutrient recommendations are the bare minimum so you do not die. Vast literature is ad populum fallacy. Also consider that genetic background matters in nutritional matters and well... The populations under study have changed, a
3. 3.▲
   by thrawa1235432 2y ago

   Yes, I agree with you, the Economist from the 90s was a different animal. If you ask me the above article is just paid shilling for Ozempic et. al. Not directly obviously, but in the mindset and viewpoint it wants to develop in readers
4. 4.▲
   by thrawa1235432 2y ago

   In that case we can just take Ozempic or whatever guys! Just kidding, no that's not the problem. The problem is processing destroys/alter many molecules we do not even know about or know it's full "purpose"/rol
5. 5.▲
   by thrawa1235432 2y ago

   I always take "Nobody knows!" "Nobody could have predicted!" as a warning for either something really dumb, biased, or uneducated take is about to follow.
6. 6.▲
   by thrawa1235432 2y ago

   Pretty hard considering Hegel would not even be born a few decades after Leibniz died. Agreed that it is preferable to the "fallen world" starting point of so many other philosophies. Once you think the world is fallen or broken,