thr0waway5678

5 ms·

1.
by thr0waway5678 8y ago
Hahaha comments agreeing with this sentiment are getting downvoted, and the thread itself has been flagged.
2.
by thr0waway5678 8y ago
Well, the wealthy get to take time off of work to go camping and hiking, and the poor people get to dynamite the hills their ancestors settled. Surely they're equivalent.
3.
by thr0waway5678 8y ago
That's weird. A very large chunk of poor people I've met live in urban areas, and if they don't, often lack the time or resources to do those things. I must know a special type of poor person that OP hasn't bumped into.
4.
by thr0waway5678 8y ago
It reads like "the Poors can live Outdoors!"* but I'm going to assume I'm mistaken or that that couldn't possibly be a popular opinion on hn. *this is a joke and if you want to argue that i'm implying that ever
5.
by thr0waway5678 8y ago
Can you expand on this? I genuinely don't understand the "poor people are adjacent to trees" statement in the context of an entire country. Like genuinely this sounds like solid comedy unless I'm missing something here.
6.
by thr0waway5678 8y ago
The responses to this are genuinely some of the funniest posts I've seen on this website. The amount of gymnastics people are doing to avoid mentioning that these large companies have gotten millions/billions of handouts from the
7.
by thr0waway5678 8y ago
There would never be rent seeking behavior without regulations. The natural state of mankind is perfect harmonious cooperation without the spectre of rules agreed upon by communities.
8.
by thr0waway5678 8y ago
You're totally right. All of those movie theaters that were heavily subsidized by billions in public money or tax cuts based on the promise of providing foot traffic and value to adjoining businesses should have their day!