thomnah

6 ms·

1.
by thomnah 3y ago
well you should be able to place more "sub" conversions into parameters of the same event name
2.
by thomnah 3y ago
true, i think the new design saves them money (more efficient data model); and drives people into BigQuery which will eventually be paid. But i have to say that GA4+BigQuery gives a powerful combination.
3.
Ask HN: What's your preferred way of saving your Google Analytics 3 data?
2 points by thomnah 3y ago|5 comments
4.
Show HN: GA3-exporter. Save your Google Analytics 3 data before it's gone(ga3-exporter.com)
2 points by thomnah 3y ago|0 comments
5.
by thomnah 8y ago
Custom CSS properties make CSS even more powerful. For example you can configure a menu to fade in fullscreen on mobile while sliding in from left on desktop.
6.
Custom CSS properties: create responsive behaviour(blog.logrocket.com)
3 points by thomnah 8y ago|1 comments
7.
by thomnah 8y ago
That probably a good way to follow in future...
8.
by thomnah 8y ago
that's funny because i was always annoyed about the back functionality deleting all my carefully entered form data when unintentionally activating this gesture. Anyway you are right. we need to make this configurable. Apart from that i
9.
by thomnah 8y ago
The concept behind layerJS is very fundamental, so fundamental that one even thinks its already there. It must be there, but it's not. We looked deep. So we created a polyfill (please see my previous response). Of course you can code
10.
by thomnah 8y ago
this is a very valid request. And we are thinking about it. But note that layerJS is not a collection of effects. It actually uses the same mechanism for every effect (that's the concept behind it). Maybe we can off-load some of the ro
11.
by thomnah 8y ago
Oh hey, that's quite a critical comment. But usually the best comes out of criticism. So let me go a bit deeper to explain our case. layerJS is not implementing a single UX effect. Then it would be indeed a bit too big for that. (Actu
12.
by thomnah 8y ago
no there is no dependency in layerJS. Also not on jQuery.
13.
by thomnah 8y ago
yes, that's on the todo list to couple scrolling of two overlapping layers (e.g. scroll other layer x times)
14.
by thomnah 8y ago
totally agreed. I went into the declarative/static argumentation on medium https://medium.com/@layerjs/getting-started-with-layerjs-17f... but it really depends on the audience if these terms trigger the interest.
15.
by thomnah 8y ago
basically layerJS will reparse if it detects a change rigth inside one of its objects. This works for example in a vuejs app we create. If the framework actually rebuilds the whole DOM hierarchy the layerJS parse would need to be triggered
16.
by thomnah 8y ago
this actually works. I just use the short forms in the documentation because it is more compact and more understandable
17.
by thomnah 8y ago
actually this is currently handcoded calling the JS api of layerJS at specific time points. Let me know if you need this somewhere i can share the code.
18.
by thomnah 8y ago
This is really not meant restrictive. Its basically MIT and only restricting one particular use case (if you want to build a webeditor like WIX, etc. ) It's currently protecting our baby startup (layerjs.com) and should avoid that some
19.
by thomnah 8y ago
not intentionally. It's scrolling inside a div and not on the body. So the reason must be somewhere there. I have to look into it.
20.
by thomnah 8y ago
Thanks!
21.
by thomnah 8y ago
can you post a screenshot at developers@layerjs.org? and which device are you using? Thx!
22.
by thomnah 8y ago
Thanks. Yes you are absolutely right. It is of course a JS library, but its API is full "HTML". So you only need to do things to your HTML to control it. Actually we think that the concepts of layerJS are pretty much in line with
23.
by thomnah 8y ago
Made a hotfix. Still has a little issue that the overlay text sticks through the frames. Should be useable for now. Thanks!
24.
by thomnah 8y ago
The way it is getting along with other frameworks is that makes as little asumptions as possible. So layerJS will only deal with divs that have the attribute "lj-type". The it will only show, animate or hide them. There are a few
25.
by thomnah 8y ago
hmm, is it that you can't see the content when it enters the 3d view? It's weird safari seems to put the containing divs background color in front if the 3d animation. I'll try to hotfix that
26.
by thomnah 8y ago
Thx! Will fix!
27.
by thomnah 8y ago
That's a pitty because i think this explains the concept best. The "video" is indeed not a video. It's actually layerJS operating on a "dummy" website. We tested it on a few devices including iOS. Which device
28.
by thomnah 8y ago
(: good old times
29.
by thomnah 8y ago
Thanks for reporting! The website uses a mechanism to load subpages dynamically. I guess the closing and opening restores the history, but reloads the page from the server. The the content from layerjs.org is missing, but the history "
30.
by thomnah 8y ago
yes, layerJS needs a "Stage" where navigation can happen so the scrollable content will be inside that Stage. In this case the body is the stage and the page is a frame inside it. We are working on something where the stage length

More ›