thinkx

5 ms·

1.
by thinkx 3y ago
monumental? OrioleDB works anywhere where you are running your own self-managed Postgres instance.. be it on bare-metal, or VMs, or EC2. this is NOT a new database
2.
by thinkx 3y ago
OrioleDB is based on earlier work done in the core Postgres to introduce a storage extension framework called Table Access Methods. This phase adds significant enhancements to make the OrioleDB extension feasible and aggressively performant
3.
by thinkx 3y ago
stay tuned, there is a concerted effort to bring this area up to standards too.. more details will be discussed at the upcoming PGCon Ottawa and you will blogs on this subject in the latter half of the year
4.
by thinkx 3y ago
Coming to Postgres, UNDO logs and no vacuum https://github.com/orioledb/
5.
by thinkx 3y ago
take a peek at https://github.com/orioledb/orioledb if the Uber blog is your frame of reference
6.
by thinkx 3y ago
we’d love to test this scenario with the new OrioleDB storage engine for Postgres.
7.
by thinkx 5y ago
only the additional “hooks” for Table Access Methods need to get up streamed into the core Postgres. OrioleDB is a separate storage engine and not designed to replace the current engine, and be used as an adjunct storage option
8.
by thinkx 5y ago
important distinction - this uses the Postgres Table Access Method to add an additional storage engine to the Postgres platform.. this is NOT a replacement for the current storage engine and can co-exist and be used on a per-table basis
9.
by thinkx 5y ago
Find out who has invested in EDB, the leading Postgres vendor in the market. Postgres is a foundation, so there is no central entity to invest in.
10.
by thinkx 6y ago
Postgres has a core design philosophy of being “extensible”. This should be embraced..
11.
by thinkx 6y ago
> MySQL is a perfect match for most SaaS applications that deal with compliance. Postgres is simply not. Please elaborate on this “simply not”.. you are making a categorical statement.. does there exist a DISA-certified STIG for MySQL, f
12.
by thinkx 6y ago
Bruce Momjian wrote a few blogs about code quality.. the phrase “brutal replacement of old code” comes to mind
13.
by thinkx 6y ago
> though there are trade offs. Please elaborate on this, it would be instructive
14.
by thinkx 6y ago
that’s a throwaway opinion, worth the time you spent writing it
15.
by thinkx 7y ago
what replaced Schemaless?
16.
by thinkx 8y ago
It is unfortunate that Kdb+ likes to tout benchmarks against Influx etc, but their license prevents anyone else from doing the same.
17.
by thinkx 10y ago
Long time gestating.. awesome to see a full-blown open-source product!