thiht

56 ms·

751.
by thiht 3y ago
It’s not the same thing. With Spotify there’s no expectation of owning the music, I pay my subscription knowing that I pay for an access to a music catalog. Although it sucks, I know some titles can disappear from my playlist from time to t
752.
by thiht 3y ago
Without surprise I see no mention of a refund. I fail to see how their « licensing agreement » is any of the customer’s business. They « sold » something they didn’t have the right to sell , instead of renting it. Sony should be forced by
753.
by thiht 3y ago
Pretty cool TLD, I like this one.
754.
by thiht 3y ago
Regarding RDAP, it actually is enforced by ICANN, it’s been mandatory for a few years for gTLDs (not sure if it is, or can be made mandatory for ccTLDs). All registrars handling gTLDs should now have an RDAP, otherwise they’re in breach of
755.
by thiht 3y ago
Why don’t you update dev+qa at the same time? Or qa+sandbox? Or dev+qa+sandbox? Separating these 3 might make sense for the applicative part (and even then, I think 4 environments is too many), but I’m not sure it really make sense to follo
756.
by thiht 3y ago
> There won’t be any surprises in the review. There can always be surprises. Sometimes when you see something implemented you can get a « click » as to why another solution would be better. It happens to me regularly both on the receivin
757.
by thiht 3y ago
> A PR is waaaaay too late to bring up No. That’s literally the point of a review.
758.
by thiht 3y ago
It's neutral. For example, it was used with metric system definitions: at some point the "kilogramme-étalon" was literally an object weighing 1kg (by definition, the kg was this object). You can see here a kilogramme étalon
759.
by thiht 3y ago
Not sure if it’s used a lot in English, but in French a « valeur étalon » is a value of reference. Like you measure something precisely, define it as standard and it becomes your étalon for future measures I guess it’s used in this sense he
760.
by thiht 3y ago
It is protectionism indeed, but not only. There’s 2 ways using the correct term is a good thing: - first for the consumer. If everything is named « champagne », it stops existing. It means there’s no way to know if you’re getting champagne
761.
by thiht 3y ago
The fuss is that if you call everything champagne, then champagne doesn’t exist anymore. It becomes impossible to know if you get the real stuff or not. This is very anti-consumer. That’s not just a problem with « made in China » copycats,
762.
by thiht 3y ago
That’s not my experience at all. You do know you can run arbitrary shell scripts, and that means they don’t need to think of every possible use case? If your CI process is so complex that YAML + arbitrary code doesn’t work, you might want t
763.
by thiht 3y ago
See, this is deceptive because Champagne is more like a brand, not a type of product. The type of product is « sparkling wine », « méthode champenoise » or « méthode traditionnelle ». Using Champagne in the name is lying. « Steak » is not a
764.
by thiht 3y ago
Dictionaries add definitions based on common usage, and in common usage, « xxx steak » can definitely refer to a plant based steak. If I say « soy steak », you definitely know what it refers to, and it’s not ambiguous with « steak » alone.
765.
by thiht 3y ago
I’m French so I’m extremely in favor of naming things correctly. For example I’m cringing hard when I see Americans not understanding what the big deal is with « Champagne » vs « sparkling wine ». However I think it makes sense to name new
766.
by thiht 3y ago
This is so frustrating. I went from Netflix+Disney Plus+Prime Video to just Netflix, because every single time I wanted to watch something specific, it’s not available on any platform. I kept Netflix because they fill the « I don’t know wha
767.
by thiht 3y ago
Thanks! I didn’t realize there was an escape sequence for hyperlinks
768.
by thiht 3y ago
What does « hyperlink support » mean? The release notes don’t give details, except that it’s supported.
769.
by thiht 3y ago
The American Dream is not dying. It died decades ago.
770.
by thiht 3y ago
Depends. It can be something I need, but it makes sense to wait a few months to save a few hundred bucks. 20% on a nice TV can be 200-300€. I see your point, but with your definition you never « need » anything except for food, water and he
771.
by thiht 3y ago
What’s the differentiating feature? What makes it better than ProductHunt? I’m all for alternatives but… why?
772.
by thiht 3y ago
> If you need something you would have got it already Not necessarily, it’s common for people to wait for Black Friday for big purchases.
773.
by thiht 3y ago
This is awful. Text is not selectable and the back button is broken. Nice work coming from a multi-billion $ company.
774.
by thiht 3y ago
They shouldn't.
775.
by thiht 3y ago
Hopefully so that ad companies willing to do it are patent blocked
776.
by thiht 3y ago
I do that too (except I use a soft checkout instead of —hard, I prefer to review and delete the reset changes myself). I tried using git worktree for a while when working on multiple branches, but it’s a pain to use… Stashing is easier.
777.
by thiht 3y ago
What does the staging area has to do with tests?
778.
by thiht 3y ago
I tried searching « chocolate », and I have to select an option in the list (chocolate beverage powder dry mix, chocolate beverage powder light dry mix…) I want to search just « chocolate »
779.
by thiht 3y ago
> we could turn the numbers optimistic and say that 40% of Americans not living paycheck-to-paycheck is pretty impressive Yeah, don't do that. There's nothing remotely optimistic about that.
780.
by thiht 3y ago
I’m French so it might be the same reason, the tab character is tab, but the tab GUI element is « onglet » It’s funny how the brain works sometimes.

More ›