thiht

43 ms·

631.
by thiht 2y ago
This is a firewall issue, not a software issue. If your auditor think you shouldn't call OpenAI servers, they should ask the network team to set firewall rules in place.
632.
by thiht 2y ago
It doesn't, it CAN do it. In the same way you can use curl in iTerm to call OpenAI servers. But if you don't do it, it won't do it on its own.
633.
by thiht 2y ago
> good Mac-centric alternatives for folks who don't want OpenAI snooping around their terminal iTerm, since they don't do that. Just keep it disabled. Unless you consider any terminal that lets you make network calls to OpenAI
634.
by thiht 2y ago
Impressive release. I absolutely love this: > If you use shell integration and the output of a > command goes past the top of the screen, the > command will be shown at the top.
635.
by thiht 2y ago
They use OpenAI's API with the possibility to set a custom URL, so... done. This makes iTerm compatible with any LLM as long as they implement the same API. OpenAI's API is the de facto standard for now, it's not up to iTerm
636.
by thiht 2y ago
> Does all software need to have AI features now All software where it makes sense, yes. AI/LLM are a tool, especially efficient with text, so having terminal integration will be useful to some. Honestly if an AI can annotate some o
637.
by thiht 2y ago
> Is it just me, or allowing hallucinations into my terminal a line that I am not willing to cross? Depends how you use it. For example, writing jq filters, or awk scripts, or some shell pipelines is always a bit of a pain. It's som
638.
by thiht 2y ago
Yeah, that’s just a bad meme at this point
639.
by thiht 2y ago
Hot take
640.
by thiht 2y ago
I’ve configured Copilot to generate suggestions only when I explicitly use a keyboard shortcut and it’s been a game changer for me. I’ve developed a good intuition of what it’s good at and now I much prefer invoking it manually. When it aut
641.
by thiht 2y ago
What does SFH mean?
642.
Ask HN: 1 passkey per device, or store it in password manager?
12 points by thiht 2y ago|4 comments
643.
by thiht 2y ago
> The iPad isn't a piano. The iPad isn't a guitar. You cannot replace any of those musical instruments with an iPad. You can't paint on canvas with an iPad, so destroying paint is silly. Literacy truly is dead… Do you know
644.
by thiht 2y ago
It is propaganda though, the answers are extremely biased to make people feel bad. Take « How loyal do you consider yourself to be to the Apple brand? », why are there 2 answers saying "I’m fine with others using non-Apple products&quo
645.
by thiht 2y ago
> I also hate that there are 3 special keys and command and ctrl are separated. Having cmd and ctrl distinct keys is great in a terminal though, no more conflict between "copy" and "kill". Also you should not "ha
646.
by thiht 2y ago
> and an anti-Apple advocate of even longer Do something more productive with your time… Not all people enjoy the same thing. I love my iPhone and my MacBook Pro for tons of reason, but someone "anti-Apple" will never listen t
647.
by thiht 2y ago
Seems about right! Do you even love a tool if you don’t complain about it?
648.
by thiht 2y ago
Do they? The designers I’ve worked with all absolutely loved Figma.
649.
by thiht 2y ago
> This is literally just basic systems engineering Well… yes it is. Public interfaces and contracts, anyone? Decoupling?
650.
by thiht 2y ago
Both can be true though, it can create an integrated system where everything systemd-* works together, but where you can replace any systemd-* you don’t like with something else
651.
by thiht 2y ago
> Safari is just a piece of junk This hasn't been true for a few years. When I bought my first iPhone a few years ago (the iPhone 12 in 2020), Safari indeed was a piece of junk. But starting the very next iteration cycle (iOS 14 or
652.
by thiht 2y ago
> having a method return an Optional that will sometimes also return null Wow that's terrible. When Optional landed in Java (8?) I came to the conclusion that the point was to use it as a contract from the developer of a method: &qu
653.
by thiht 2y ago
It's normal to build new stuff based on the experience we got from what came before. If you like asdf, use asdf, there's nothing wrong with using it, and there's nothing wrong with wanting something "better" (depend
654.
by thiht 2y ago
I’m guessing 11 in the name is for X11, but why is Wayland 12? Wouldn’t a name like WtoX or WayToX be more useful? 2to3 made sense for Python 2 to 3, but using the same naming scheme is a bit weak, isn’t it?
655.
by thiht 2y ago
FWIW I use ChatGPT’s voice feature in French and it works extremely well
656.
by thiht 3y ago
> I'm curious to hear why you think so though? As I said: it would mean you’d have to attribute everything you learned while reading open source codes to every codebase you read every time you write code.
657.
by thiht 3y ago
Yeah in 2019 Typescript was already the clear winner, no contest
658.
by thiht 3y ago
Attribution doesn’t apply on training. We’d all be screwed otherwise, it would mean you’d have to attribute everything you learned while reading open source codes to every codebase you read every time you write code.
659.
by thiht 3y ago
Training on your code and using your code are very different things. As a human, if your code is open, I can read it, learn how it works and reuse my knowledge to create proprietary source code without infringing on your license.
660.
by thiht 3y ago
Oh easy, there’s not appropriate license yet. Some organizations need to step up and create a license that forbids AI training. But it will probably not happen because of "but is it libre open source" useless debates.

More ›