thetic

4 ms·

1.
by thetic 3y ago
these kinds of things are already possible (albeit without animation) with native features: - https://neovim.io/doc/user/pi_paren.html - https://neovim.io/doc/user/lsp.html#lsp-highlight
2.
by thetic 3y ago
I don't even think that's a controversial opinion. Breaking convention isn't inherently bad; it has costs, some of which you described. In this case specifically, the novelty is not justified by any significant benefit.
3.
by thetic 3y ago
If only there were a way to indicate the function argument isn't mutated. </s> My spidey senses tingle whenever I see const-ness cast away because it almost always means something is wrong. Either a function is missing a qua
4.
by thetic 3y ago
The legal cases in which he needs to cast away const could be avoided if the arguments to called functions were appropriately qualified.
5.
by thetic 3y ago
> #define sizeof(x) (size)sizeof(x) Undefined behavior[1] > #define assert(c) while (!(c)) __builtin_unreachable() Undefined behavior[1] > I’ll cast away the const if needed. Undefined behavior[2] > The assignments are separ
6.
by thetic 4y ago
https://github.com/python-poetry/roadmap/issues/3
7.
by thetic 4y ago
This is planned for the next release: https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/14790
8.
by thetic 4y ago
- qutebrowser - vifm - ranger - i3 - sway - tmux - zathura - tig
9.
by thetic 4y ago
Kitty does not run on Windows.
10.
by thetic 5y ago
Sure. This may not be a feasible approach for this case. I'm just pointing out alternative approaches to mitigate this kind of scoping problem in C89. Maybe wrap every use of list_for_each_entry in braces? { list_for_each
11.
by thetic 5y ago
Though C89 does not support declaration of a scoped loop variable like C99 does: for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { // ... } C89 does support declaration of variables at the top of braced blocks whose scope is l
12.
by thetic 6y ago
Though limited, C++ does support default parameters: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/default_arguments .
13.
by thetic 9y ago
Wouldn't the header need to be explicitly listed as a dependency to prompt it's generation anyway?
14.
by thetic 9y ago
> The bad news is that inference rules are not compatible with out-of-source builds. You’ll need to repeat the same commands for each rule as if inference rules didn’t exist. This is tedious for large projects, so you may want to have so
15.
by thetic 9y ago
This one tripped me up too. I'm guessing he meant `a |= b`.
16.
by thetic 9y ago
On the subject of annoying ambiguities in mathematical notations, I would like to point out the ridiculous convention of inverse function notation. Is there any sensible rationale for sin^(-1)(x) meaning arcsin(x) while sin^2(x) means (sin(
17.
by thetic 10y ago
I used Input Mono for quite a while, but the '8' and 'B' characters are too easy to confuse.
18.
by thetic 10y ago
This sounds like visual mode.