Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
therealjumbo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
therealjumbo
5y ago
Then why have a client side scanner in the first place? You're exposing the hashes to the world, you're not able to E2E encrypt anything if you need to server side scan, which you probably do since trusting the client no matter wh
32.
▲
by
therealjumbo
5y ago
Government run? The EU is about to _require_ the sort of CSAM scanning that Apple is running on devices and the rest are running on the cloud. Also: https://www.reuters.com/technology/exclusive-facebook-tech-g... Gover
33.
▲
by
therealjumbo
5y ago
How will you know? And actually, how will Apple know that's all their doing? They won't because all they can see is a hash, so they don't actually know if they're checking for anti-winnie the pooh memes, or CP. And there
34.
▲
by
therealjumbo
5y ago
>The false-positive will be cleared up and no reputations sullied... This is dangerously naive. The US justice system alone will hound people on goosed up charges and try to get people to accept a plea deal and write a bogus confession.
35.
▲
by
therealjumbo
5y ago
Along with this: https://www.reuters.com/technology/exclusive-facebook-tech-g... Just like the Patriot Act and the no fly list, it's only a very short matter of time until this is expanded to Android and more impo
36.
▲
by
therealjumbo
5y ago
The timeless response: https://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/education/the-stem-crisis-...
37.
▲
by
therealjumbo
5y ago
> I genuinely believe to spend resources on issues where ROI is positive. How are you measuring the ROI of security efforts inside an OSS distro like debian or nixos? The effort in such orgs is freely given, so nobody knows how much it
38.
▲
by
therealjumbo
5y ago
Do you think a manual audit of 100k lines of code will uncover multi-threading or memory issues or any other security issue? Experience has shown that for c code for the first two, no it won't. And for any language code, manual audits
39.
▲
by
therealjumbo
5y ago
ofubd8kc: Right, so straight and such superficial comparisons are wrong for this reason. Most of the glibc code isn't used for any given compilation. Similarly for systemd, most of the code is being compiled into binaries outside of sy
40.
▲
by
therealjumbo
5y ago
Arch is primarily a systemd distro. I think it sounds like you should seriously sit down and think about why don't you want systemd, but answer some other questions first. You're running windows with all of its telemetry and longs
41.
▲
by
therealjumbo
5y ago
Facebook banned a New York Post story that was factual and not inflammatory: https://thehill.com/homenews/media/548612-facebook-prevents-... So people or stories get banned even if they are true for some other rea
42.
▲
by
therealjumbo
5y ago
Couldn't they still do this? I think there was a project a ways back to add a lua frontend to CMake. It's been since abandoned, but I don't see why it couldn't be revitalized. I guess the project just doesn't see th
43.
▲
by
therealjumbo
5y ago
What is the typical response to "if you don't like it leave"? Why isn't "if you don't like it leave" a productive suggestion in pretty much any case? Per the guidelines of this site, we are recommended to
44.
▲
by
therealjumbo
5y ago
I think the more interesting cases are 3D printing of weapons, and in the future programmable biological material. One of his statements is that he himself, may not like the applications enabled by general purpose computing, but that even i
45.
▲
by
therealjumbo
6y ago
How are masks 99% effective against the seasonal flu, but not nearly as effective against COVID-19?
46.
▲
by
therealjumbo
6y ago
If "extremism" gets banned, then individuals are incentivized to get things they don't like labeled as extremism. We wouldn't be having this conversation if the things labeled extremism and thus banned from platforms wa
47.
▲
by
therealjumbo
6y ago
No, the alternative is that the execs at ebay grow a spine and tell the morality censors to go pound sand. Not that complicated.
48.
▲
by
therealjumbo
6y ago
Preventing transactions between two third parties (i.e. ebay) is economically similar to refusing to do business with another party. Except that if your in position to do the latter, you're obviously a platform for others, and thus you
49.
▲
by
therealjumbo
6y ago
>What is politeness but acting in a manner that is respectful of the sensitivities of our peers? How do you deal with bad actors? How do companies like ebay deal with bad actors in this realm?
50.
▲
by
therealjumbo
6y ago
>Woke crazies try to impose their ideology on others by complaining and shaming on the Internet. >I get worried when people promote the idea that compelling others speech is pro free speech. It's the modern newspeak. That is esse
51.
▲
Visiting Another World
(lwn.net)
4 points
by
therealjumbo
6y ago
|
0 comments
52.
▲
by
therealjumbo
6y ago
The text of the bill here: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml... The stated reason for this bill is a bald-faced lie. The bear population in CA has been exploding. A good overview of the bill
53.
▲
California would ban bear hunting under new legislation wild population rebounds
(sacbee.com)
1 points
by
therealjumbo
6y ago
|
1 comments
54.
▲
by
therealjumbo
6y ago
I was just hit in a head on collision at 6 AM by a drunk driver. The driver was buying meth in our small town, and returning to their small town. The dealer sold meth to somebody who was obviously far, far beyond the point of being able to
55.
▲
by
therealjumbo
6y ago
I'd say probably not no. * I don't see how that wouldn't solve any problem with actual gun crime. Cars are required to be registered since they are meaningfully "operated" in public peacefully, guns aren't. For
56.
▲
by
therealjumbo
6y ago
I don't need to register the vehicle if I don't drive it on public property. I don't need to submit my information to the government to buy the vehicle. And I don't need a drivers license on private property either.
57.
▲
by
therealjumbo
6y ago
>Rules, policies, laws, Hammurabi's Code - they're all just leadership decisions made in advance. The problem here is that the leadership clearly doesn't really care. They got a complaint, they "investigated," an
58.
▲
by
therealjumbo
6y ago
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/sec... Specifically: >No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, ... , enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State In this case, since s
59.
▲
by
therealjumbo
6y ago
The biggest problem with it is that it's unconstitutional. States are not allowed to make agreements with each other parallel to the system. EDIT: if you can get that many states to agree to it, then you could have just done a constitu
60.
▲
by
therealjumbo
6y ago
Wikipedia doesn't "need" to appeal to users for donations. They currently have more money than they'll ever need to develop wiki and to run wikipedia. They do that so they can add more staff and more projects. Which is a
More ›