thegreatkahuna

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by thegreatkahuna 2mo ago

   Yes, that is correct
2. 2.▲
   by thegreatkahuna 2mo ago

   I agree that in perfect world I could have done this exercise with competent engineers and a UX desginer. I know about software development processes and applied that to e.g. testing and hardening, but it is not a substitute for deep techni
3. 3.▲
   by thegreatkahuna 2mo ago

   Thanks for the link! You could very well be right that there is not much more that could be done before the review. My reading of what Kelsey said is that agents can produce useful outcomes, it is just that humans need to validate and own t
4. 4.▲
   by thegreatkahuna 2mo ago

   I suppose you are right at least what comes to the functionality. Security is the one thing where I am sure that my company will require some peaking under the hood.
5. 5.▲
   by thegreatkahuna 2mo ago

   I hear you. This must have been a long time ago, like last year or something. Those were the times.
6. 6.▲
   by thegreatkahuna 2mo ago

   I have asked the AI, but was hoping for a second opinion, ideally by someone who has experience from doing something a bit similar. Your point about QA is interesting. Bob Martin, doesn't review AI code any more, just does extensive QA
7. 7.▲
   Ask HN: How would you harden AI changes to a 1M-line legacy SaaS before review?

   4 points by thegreatkahuna 2mo ago|16 comments