thecodeassassin

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by thecodeassassin 3y ago

   This is not boilerplate, otherwise every cloud provider would have this and they do not. This problem can be solved by much less broad terms.
2. 2.▲
   by thecodeassassin 7y ago

   *refresh fixed it ?
3. 3.▲
   by thecodeassassin 7y ago

   Hi, Why does it still show up as beta?
4. 4.▲
   by thecodeassassin 9y ago

   Yeah i'm working on a replacement for this service, this is absolutely unacceptable to us.
5. 5.▲
   by thecodeassassin 9y ago

   Did you try putting something like Varnish in front of it? I think you can do the same with nginx, Varnish is just the first thing that popped up in my mind.
6. 6.▲
   by thecodeassassin 9y ago

   Nice! Why did you choose to implement it as a proxy instead of using it as a primary source and just fetch from S3 on-the-fly while caching the generated image? If capacity is the problem then making it HA should solve that issue?
7. 7.▲
   Imgix service broken, wise to avoid and self host?

   6 points by thecodeassassin 9y ago|11 comments