the_king

8 ms·

61.
by the_king 3y ago
We use our own fusion model in the transcription pipeline for intent understanding from encoded audio, but most of the rewriting tasks like "Turn this into a list" call out to fine-tunes of GPT-4. It's a combination. The fusi
62.
by the_king 3y ago
Thanks! We had to make a bunch of breaking API changes over the last week and the Mac app isn't ready to go on it quite yet, but we'll bring it back as soon as we can, max two weeks, hopefully sooner.
63.
by the_king 3y ago
Appreciate the feedback, we'll take a look at that.
64.
by the_king 3y ago
We agree totally; voice only can be ridiculous, for example, if you're spelling out a username or something. The sandbox doesn't have typing, but the full app does - you can switch between typing and talking seamlessly there. (wri
65.
by the_king 3y ago
Cursorless is really cool, but we see the ideal computer-voice interaction a little differently. Our approach is based around understanding intent from speech alone. We think this will be the ideal division of labor between man and machine
66.
Launch HN: Aqua Voice (YC W24) – Voice-driven text editor
716 points by the_king 3y ago|244 comments
67.
by the_king 3y ago
There are new tools here I'm excited to try, especially the open-source ones. One of the things that is still TBD about this wave of ai companies: what are the pain points in building products that people actually want to use? I guess
68.
by the_king 3y ago
Thus the last and always unuttered slogan of modernity: no lives matter.
69.
by the_king 3y ago
One question is: "How easy is HTML to read for humans." Everyone who has spent more than a few months writing software will be familiar with the idea. But for someone who has never seen it - is the concept intuitive? Do bright 8th