Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
than3
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
25 ms
·
211.
▲
by
than3
3y ago
This isn't really users trying to make money from their skills. This is a company taking user contributions as their own, aggregating it, and using their work for free to make money off it.
212.
▲
by
than3
3y ago
Not really, you have so much garbage mixed in from troll-bots.
213.
▲
by
than3
3y ago
https://archive.ph/Mrvvg
214.
▲
by
than3
3y ago
Unfortunately no. It's constantly changing, and you only get a peak into how it all works when there's a massive expose/leak such as the Panama Papers.
215.
▲
by
than3
3y ago
This is not a solution, it also adds a whole slew of other problems. Also saying hashes are irreversible doesn't actually make that so.
216.
▲
by
than3
3y ago
Deeper regulation doesn't do what you think it would. They need to retool the incentives and taxes, basically make it so its not worth growing beyond 8% marketshare. Anything larger and you get coercion, influence, and monopolistic pra
217.
▲
by
than3
3y ago
> The two authors of this piece previously wrote for the Financial Times, so they have a lot of credibility. Honestly, taking their work on its face, they really don't have any credibility. They misattribute, and show a complete lac
218.
▲
by
than3
3y ago
Even these people aren't directly responsible. The directly responsible ones, for the most part, don't appear in public records.
219.
▲
by
than3
3y ago
No, this bloomberg columnist is just writing what their bosses want them to write. Its mass manipulation on a grand scale, they want to blame the consumer for inflation, instead of the real cause. Anyone that knows anything realizes what a
220.
▲
by
than3
3y ago
Em, this isn't meant as a snipe but has to be said because you clearly didn't read and comprehend. Read what was said, and make sure you look up the definition of words like over-generalization beforehand (its a logical fallacy).
221.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
Article doesn't look credible. Looks more like a malign influence piece meant to distract. Takes an identity politics approach, mixes in a small bit of truth, and a lot of insufficiently backed opinion, with known flawed metrics to bac
222.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
I usually SOIC clip/backup the firmware on Ubiquity and other devices we own, before doing anything like this (more recently). Its usually so much faster and reliable than an RMA in most cases for a simple firmware update fail, especia
223.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
That's very common, do you know the general why? Usually the power brick is poorly isolated and/or you have dirty electricity, it results in errors on an ongoing basis that get logged to the small amount of onboard memory. (not u
224.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
Honestly, based off what you said, in my opinion you clearly lack credibility. The very least you could do is properly quote what I actually said instead of poorly paraphrasing, and then holding that paraphrase up as an example (with a diff
225.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
It all really depends on your definition of IT person. Some IT Helpdesk people are most definitely not IT, they just have a knowledge base they look things up, assuming they can' understand what you are saying. Many companies offshore
226.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
Well that is a very common trap with writing, not choosing an appropriate audience for what you are writing about will send you down a rabbit hole. There are some things you simply cannot explain to a beginner audience because they lack the
227.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
In all fairness, to me this reads as more of a rant man-splation for why thing's aren't productive, and largely misses the point. Its also fairly niche and specific to developers that have a very developer-only mindset. Anyone who
228.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
If the site text is not easily readable by anyone, you are doing something wrong. This is like saying, we want to make our site progressive, so we'll embed a bunch of things in a magic eye, and the people reading can do free-viewing fo
229.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
Depends on how you define financially stressed. I call negative cash flow financially stressed, they seem to have a different definition. Overall it will probably trend closer to 90% as hyper-inflation hits.
230.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
Having just short of 15 years of personal experience with this I can say with certainty, the issue is accountability. There simply is none, and what's considered fraud in any other industry is just business as usual.
231.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
If you have to explain, you've already lost the battle.
232.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
Many business people fail to plot trends correctly out longer than a few years. Information follows the same S curve most adoption follows. Anything you collect, is a liability once its stolen and eventually it becomes freely available rega
233.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
This is very naive and misguided. I disagree completely. To address the main points. Historically people use things in ways that they can, not how they ought to, this has happened every time no matter what people say or do beforehand. If th
234.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
> I have a masters degree in computer science In the interest of not sniping, I'll put it plainly. You clearly do not know what you are supposed to know if that were true. There's no point in me talking to you any further, you
235.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/debasement.asp
236.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
A millionaire today is someone that had $100,000 roughly 10 years ago. Hardly comparable.
237.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
> For a very long time, the two basic opposing ends of the ... That's not actually been true since the 90s. It just seemed that way because you believed the lies initially, then you grew as a person and discovered they were lies and
238.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
While it is an interesting diatribe, its clearly echo chamberish. There's a psychology study showing that people's sense of freedom and agency are significantly reduced in the presence of coercion. That's a much more interest
239.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
You clearly either didn't read, or didn't comprehend what I wrote if you think that. There is nothing I can do about that.
240.
▲
by
than3
4y ago
Its not a false premise, there has been many anthropological studies that form the basis for catastrophism, extinction and a changing earth, they have been backed up with evidence for hundreds of years. To claim otherwise is simply discount
More ›