th0ma5

20 ms·

271.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Check out this https://github.com/Atoptool/atop/issues/330 possibly related GitHub issue?
272.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Don't you think that presenting this as learning or knowledge is unethical?
273.
by th0ma5 2y ago
I think you need to realize your fans don't have the same intent as you. You should ask your audience what they want you may be surprised.
274.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Why do you keep promoting your blog on every LLM post?
275.
by th0ma5 2y ago
How have you been able to tie benchmark results to better results?
276.
by th0ma5 2y ago
This in my opinion is the fundamental problem where because LLMs work on a computer there is an assumption of correctness in surprising ways. In reality, when you mix a deterministic system and a probabilistic system you always get a probab
277.
by th0ma5 2y ago
This should be the top comment in here, and it seems like the elephant in the room.
278.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Does seem comparable to Tesseract? I feel like the accuracy results are still not significantly improved as a whole.
279.
by th0ma5 2y ago
In my experience this only marginally improves things. It constantly offers new ways to be wrong.
280.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Rhetorically speaking here, would you object if the name literally was SGT_Cant_Say_Anything_Smart ? If they did this it would certainly be memorable.
281.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Sweet !
282.
by th0ma5 2y ago
GQRX is great
283.
by th0ma5 2y ago
With something with more bandwidth than an RTL-SDR you may be able to at least capture the data but having dedicated hardware for the target signal is the easiest if you're looking to tune. I've seen POC Analog TV signal decoding
284.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Racist is the wrong word probably maybe ... antisocial in that it is against society.
285.
by th0ma5 2y ago
No they are not randomly wrong or right without perspective unless they have some kind of brain injury. So that's against the title but the rest of their point is interesting!
286.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Is saying that you're critical of AI the new approach to being uncritical of it?
287.
by th0ma5 2y ago
That no one is offering this says something very profound to me. Either they don't work and are too risky to entrust a company to, or leadership thinks they are immune and are entitled to wield AI exclusively, or some mix of these thin
288.
by th0ma5 2y ago
I think this is the main problem with this, like H2O offers Spark integration as well their own clustering solution, but most people with this problem have their own opinionated and bespoke needs.
289.
by th0ma5 2y ago
I think everyone wants that but there really is no silver Bullet in explaining or understanding how to make this technology more effective or more accurate. The companies themselves can radically change the models, behavior intentionally an
290.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Once you suspend disbelief of AI all of this pseudoscience becomes just as plausible.
291.
by th0ma5 2y ago
A great question for people wanting to use OCR in business is... Which digits in monetary amounts can you tolerate being incorrect?
292.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Yes sorry for the double reply I didn't know they were using the rp2040! Thanks for mentioning that !!
293.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Yes maybe a couple of hundred milliwatts at most.
294.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Yes WSPR ... The acknowledgement of contact was online. I had an MFJ antenna tuner but it was just a long strand of wire lying over the roof maybe 14 gauge? Slim. Something like 100mw output power? 200mw Maybe? It ran for a couple years una
295.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Sure, just do the Zeta SDR schematic in reverse, but like others have said you'd have to figure out the rest of the chain as well as a ton of filtering. I've transmitted with direct digital synth chips as well as rpitx which is li
296.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Sure, just do the Zeta SDR schematic in reverse, but like others have said you'd have to figure out the rest of the chain as well as a tone of filtering. I've transmitted with direct digital synth chips as well as rpitx which is l
297.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Has a section for results that seems to just define what results are. Other than mirroring what other software is doing, how do we know any of these concepts are viable in the long term?
298.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Yeah fascists love to say everyone else is fascist so
299.
by th0ma5 2y ago
Tons of vendors offer cloud first, distributed deployments. Erlang is distributed by default. Spark is distributed by default. Most databases are distributed by default.
300.
by th0ma5 2y ago
There is essentially no tooling for this and vendors all default to distributed patterns. Either you directly control the scaling or you're relinquishing it.

More ›