Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
th0ma5
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
301.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
Many people I know are switching away from them because of their alleged support of fascism.
302.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
Wild to think of Mr. Van Dyke as an avid Amiga user as well.
303.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
I had a longer comment elsewhere but to me this says that the distribution is happening somewhere and what you're also saying is that companies have to decide how much they want or care to control it.
304.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
Since multicore processing a ton of software you use or create is distributed you have to ask if you want to be in control of how it is distributed or not. If you want it easy and let the library figure it out then you have to accept the to
305.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
I wish I could upvote you again. The complexity balloons when you try to adapt something that wasn't distributed, and often things can be way simpler and more robust if you start with a distributed concept.
306.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
Due to the nature of how the technology works this risk shouldn't ever be possible to eliminate without breaking fundamental parts of what we find useful. In band vs out of band signalling. So far the out of band analysis hasn't h
307.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
What language ecosystem does this right?
308.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
Right it is even more problematic with code making hidden mistakes no person would ever make.
309.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
There's also a perspective that all of the ongoing problems have been the same while newer techniques shove them under different rugs. So I can see how that would look like that to the credulous.
310.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
How would it be possible to, say, show the reality of a forest fire's devastation while not appearing to show a bias for showing charred trees?
311.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
I don't see it as righteous glee but just hoping that people will see the problem with how you could even begin to be suspicious of him. If it is so easy to get something wrong when you're trying to be correct, or get something ac
312.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
That's adjacent to their point, doing that has given the impression that anthropomorphizing was right, or that things that they do are human like but it is all a facade.
313.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
That's literally the definition of unfalsifiable though. It is equally valid to say that anything claiming to be "real" intelligence is overly confident.
314.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
It's to me more that the effort you put in is not a net gain. You don't advance a way of working with them that way because of myriad reasons including things from ownership of the models, fundamentals of the resulting total proba
315.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
No it is more like thinking that my prescribed way of doing stuff must be the way things work in general because it works for me. But you give instructions specifically about everything you did but the person you give them to isn't you
316.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
... You concede that it was cronyism here. Unless you want to expand on what you are saying.
317.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
You're confusing intuition of what works or not with being too close to your problem to make a judgement on the general applicability of your techniques.
318.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
I've read enough from Simon to know that he doesn't know how to build or maintain reliable real world systems.
319.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
Nothing to me shouts the absolute failure of AI technology than needing this team and also in some kind of emergency way.
320.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
Probably one of the most important Wired articles in years. Surprising it isn't on the front page.
321.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
And yet!
322.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
Probably also Wilhoit's law some too "There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." So not only do some people not get the right to own a gun e
323.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
That is in an international economic zone and would be subject to tariffs as well as for supplies.
324.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
Porting well written code if you know the target language well is pretty fun and fast in my experience. Often when there are library, API, or language feature differences, these are better considered outside of most work it would take to fu
325.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
It's on you however for not understanding the greater point?
326.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
I think in the non LLM world though you at least have the trail of documentation you can unwind once you're in a bind. I don't care for prompt-a-mole fighting.
327.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
In my experience you still get a lot of stuff that used to work or stuff that it just makes up.
328.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
Yes and every failure of a product turns into a support ticket.
329.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
Hate to be that guy, but which model works without fail for any task that ffmpeg can do?
330.
▲
by
th0ma5
2y ago
You should figure out what went wrong for the other commenter and fix your tool.
More ›