tgv

36 ms·

841.
by tgv 1y ago
That's a rather limited view of the responsibilities of the leader of a company. A CEO must ensure a company works properly. It's a bit of a Wall Street view: I'll have the money without the responsibilities, please.
842.
by tgv 1y ago
There's no such thing in a Windows installation as iOS and macOS offer out of the box. There are apps, though, available via the Microsoft Store. A free one, called Oxford Dictionary and Thesaurus says this in its privacy policy: III.
843.
by tgv 1y ago
Isn't this called "diminished responsbility" in the US system? There's apparently also something called "settled insanity." If you want to plead one of those, you have to provide a reason.
844.
by tgv 1y ago
Because it affects the growth of the fetus, including development of the brain. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_alcohol_spectrum_disorde...
845.
by tgv 1y ago
I'm not sure those people are hyperpolyglot (whatever that exactly means). They usually have extreme skills in two languages, one being their native language. However, a task like simultaneous translation is tough. It requires a differ
846.
by tgv 1y ago
Then everyone is in for a bad time. But a minor chance for a future negative outcome cannot outweigh a much larger chance for the same outcome right now, can it?
847.
by tgv 1y ago
Fair enough.
848.
by tgv 1y ago
> Definitely seems reasonable to say "you can train on this data but you have to have a legal copy" How many copies? They're not serving a single client. Libraries need to have multiple e-book licenses, after all.
849.
by tgv 1y ago
You have to click and drag.
850.
by tgv 1y ago
2B years ago, the U235/U238 ratios were different. Isn't that (part of) the explanation?
851.
by tgv 1y ago
Plus what 'social media' has done to our attention span. It takes some to read a book, especially literature.
852.
by tgv 1y ago
The nice thing about make is that is ubiquitous, and that it offers nice things out of the box.
853.
by tgv 1y ago
https://grayjay.app/ perhaps? It's a locally running application. Don't know how privacy friendly it exactly is, but they claim they collect very little information.
854.
by tgv 1y ago
My knowledge in these matters is limited, but natural uranium can't trigger itself, can it? At least, it can't produce the classical chain reaction, as there's not enough U235 to sustain it, I think.
855.
by tgv 1y ago
Iran also has friends wit nukes: Russian and China. And China does care: it needs a secure oil supply.
856.
by tgv 1y ago
The same goes for Iran, of course: I'd wager the majority of them would rather see the current regime go.
857.
by tgv 1y ago
You put an arbitrary cutoff date in 2023. But going back to 1948 allows your opponents to add the Iran-Iraq wars (which Iran could have ended; "Estimates of total casualties range from 1,000,000 to twice that number."), and of c
858.
by tgv 1y ago
Hamas was installed, backed and supplied by Iran.
859.
by tgv 1y ago
That's the classical LISP way of doing it: (eq (mul a a) (pow a 2)) or (eq (mul a a ) (pow a 2 ) )
860.
by tgv 1y ago
But what is it? I just see a black page with two buttons to create or join a room...
861.
by tgv 1y ago
It's the crucial part, and even with the example, I couldn't understand it. Like I can't understand why the second column in the first matrix doesn't have signs. Or why the 0 in the result matrix is negative. But in anot
862.
by tgv 1y ago
A normal tree would be easier to read eq mul pow a a a 2
863.
by tgv 1y ago
I had always blindly assumed it was polynomial. Thanks.
864.
by tgv 1y ago
The parent comment doesn't seem to be versed in complexity theory, so I tried to keep it simple. But I think the simplex method is much older. Apparently, it dates back to 1947. Why do say it wasn't known until the 80s? Are we tal
865.
by tgv 1y ago
If you like that kind of thing: manufacturers used to create demo songs for synth keyboards and modules: * Emu Proteus 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5FffG_0sqw * Emu Proteus 2: https://www.youtube.com/
866.
by tgv 1y ago
I really don’t get this. Is this a testament to how well people can fool themselves?
867.
by tgv 1y ago
That --in case it wasn't clear, and I can see why it wouldn't be-- refers to the thing you're looking at, through glass.
868.
by tgv 1y ago
You have to find the integers that fulfill a certain condition best. That's fundamentally different from real numbers. It looks exactly like other numerical problems, but there's no general solution for it, only (very good) heuris
869.
by tgv 1y ago
If our brain understands one thing, it's that glass is a wall between our body and what we see. You can't touch that, or you'll hurt yourself.
870.
by tgv 1y ago
I know "excessive" is technically correct, but at the same time it seems an understatement.

More ›