4 ms·

A normal tree would be easier to read eq mul pow a a a 2

• derriz 1y ago
  Turned 90, maybe? eq: mul: a a pow: a 2
  • tgv 1y ago
    That's the classical LISP way of doing it: (eq (mul a a) (pow a 2)) or (eq (mul a a ) (pow a 2 ) )
  • hyperhello 1y ago
    x*x == pow(x,2)
    • derriz 1y ago
      We have a winner! Actually, I'd suggest a slight improvement: x*x = x^2
      • xigoi 1y ago
        x · x = x²
    • TacticalCoder 1y ago
      (== (* x x) (pow x 2))
      • amno 1y ago
        (= * x x ^ x 2)
  • unrealhoang 1y ago
    no yaml programming please :(
    • uncircle 1y ago
      From the YAML inventor himself: https://yamlscript.org/ https://yamlscript.org/ The length people go to avoid Lisp, only to reinvent it, badly.