tgv

30 ms·

721.
by tgv 1y ago
Anthropic's CEO said 6 months, 6 months ago. https://futurism.com/six-months-anthropic-coding
722.
by tgv 1y ago
My take on this kind of view: it wasn't built on authenticity or social connection. That was what the enthusiasts were claiming it would be. It was a reference to something known, very superficial in nature, only meant to to increase t
723.
by tgv 1y ago
At least they can put "data scientist" on their linkedin profile.
724.
by tgv 1y ago
The line between bribing and tipping isn't that thin.
725.
by tgv 1y ago
Isn't radix sorting somewhat like hashing?
726.
by tgv 1y ago
True. I think we look at it from different sides. Mine is "how good will this be in independently running code" (where 80% correctness is minimally needed), yours seems to be more "how well does this represent our knowledge&q
727.
by tgv 1y ago
The problem is management and short-term stock-holder interest. If some spreadsheet cowboy convinces some C-level suit that this is the way to go, and it works now, not in 6 months time, IT and development will be made to bear the brunt. Sa
728.
by tgv 1y ago
Sounds like the European Court of Human Rights would annul it, but you can't be sure.
729.
by tgv 1y ago
Things are not so rigid here. Idk how you could work in the environment you and the parent comment describe.
730.
by tgv 1y ago
If someone can't consent to anything, can they be allowed on the street? Or even to stay in the same house as others? I think it isn't black and white. There are acts which carry a greater responsibility than others, and there are
731.
by tgv 1y ago
Apparently, the A321neo has a range of 7400km, which is more than enough for Philadelphia-Edinburgh.
732.
by tgv 1y ago
It's stated in the article: "The standout red flag was that the unique machine name used by the individual was the same as one that we had tracked in several incidents prior to them installing the agent." However, it's o
733.
by tgv 1y ago
IIRC, sonic does JIT, has inline assembly (github says 41%), and it's huge. There's no way you can audit it. If you don't need to squeeze every cpu cycle out of your json parser (and most of us don't; go wouldn't be
734.
by tgv 1y ago
That's indeed the formula. The .9999 is (1 - 1/10000), 1/10000 being the likelihood. It would perhaps have been clearer if I had chosen two different numbers...
735.
by tgv 1y ago
> 1. I genuinely don't understand why. You never make a mistake? Never ever? It's a question of numbers. If the likelihood of making a mistake is 1 in 10000 emails, send out links to 10.000 package maintainers, and you've
736.
by tgv 1y ago
It should be able to carry at least 180 passengers times 80kg = 14400kg, right? And airlines don't like losing money, so perhaps it's something else, like not having the infrastructure/licenses to haul cargo?
737.
by tgv 1y ago
Spared, even. There were more selection criteria, though, and Nagasaki was (IIRC) chosen at the last moment because of the weather.
738.
by tgv 1y ago
If that's all, I still recommend classical columns. Now if you have array values and/or values with varying structures which you don't need to query (frequently), JSON makes sense.
739.
by tgv 1y ago
How precisely?
740.
by tgv 1y ago
Evolving from doesn't make you the thing, does it? It makes you something else. Fish in particular, since that's a group of animals named by us, based on physical appearance.
741.
by tgv 1y ago
> things that look like fish Well, apart from the circularity, we don't look like fish, do we? What we look like, we define, just like we define what 'fish' is. There's no need to go all Linnaeus about it.
742.
by tgv 1y ago
> I'd invite you to look at ontologies as nothing more than representations of things we know in some text-based format. That's because we know how to interpret the concepts used in these representations, in relation to each ot
743.
by tgv 1y ago
That the argument "Chrome is better because so many people use it" is, frankly, bullshit. Which it is.
744.
by tgv 1y ago
> You can't make restrictions on what Apple is allowed to do because Google violated some law I think you can, under the assumption that Apple's decision wasn't independent/voluntary. At least, that seems how it works
745.
by tgv 1y ago
Could be real. Such knowledge representation has been used in many systems. In limited domains, it can be useful.
746.
by tgv 1y ago
It comes from "the knowledge of being," and has been used to describe real-world knowledge representation, in particular hierarchical(-ish) semantic networks in AI since its early days.
747.
by tgv 1y ago
But wouldn't that render the preview with Safari?
748.
by tgv 1y ago
This makes little sense to me. Ontologies and all that have been tried and have always been found to be too brittle. Take the examples from the front page (which I expect to be among the best in their set): human_activity => climate_chan
749.
by tgv 1y ago
> I wish they elaborated on how they measure commercial promise. Why (the fuck, I may add) would they focus on signs of commercial promise in the first place? > AI ... tends to be a conventional wisdom machine And it would therefore c
750.
by tgv 1y ago
Even if you could, how could you possibly correct the process? In the USA, it would probably take many years, possibly all the way to the Supreme Court, and the big bucks win anyway. AI believers, pay attention and stop your downplaying and

More ›