tertius

86 ms·

901.
by tertius 11y ago
I'm not an American so I don't feel a gun will "keep me safe" i.e. I won't be attacked or house broken. Though when that happens I can defend myself much better than without. Is it generally that people feel they wo
902.
by tertius 12y ago
I have this as "conservation mode" on my Lenovo Yoga Pro 2, and probably all new Lenovos.
903.
by tertius 12y ago
I have a Lenovo Yoga Pro 2, it's got an app that manages this for me. I turn on "conservation mode" and it keeps the charge at 55%-60%. The only negative here (and it would be there with doing it yourself) is that if I run ou
904.
by tertius 12y ago
No tethering with that plan.
905.
by tertius 12y ago
Do you have any source material for the effects of air travel on climate?
906.
by tertius 12y ago
As noted by another commenter Nuclear, per kWh produced, is actually (without adding the boogieman factor) pretty safe.
907.
by tertius 12y ago
Either that or more Gen3+ Nuclear. Why not both I would say.
908.
by tertius 12y ago
I still need to be convinced that those two methods can produce enough to even reach a point of surplus to be stored given our energy needs and projected future needs.
909.
by tertius 12y ago
"Making it illegal for the customer to buy something from the prostitute does not solve anything. In fact, it discourages the customer from entering into the exchange." What it does is destroy the market for those exploiting prost
910.
by tertius 12y ago
In the U.S. the major benefit to Diesel is torque. You should try comparing diesel and gas models as equally equipped as possible and see what the cost per mile is. I just bought a 2.5L Subaru Outback, if we had the 2.0L diesel version I wo
911.
by tertius 12y ago
Not having grown up in the U.S. I can say that diesel left this same impression for a very long time in the international markets. Only in the past 15 years or so has diesel been tamed for the consumer to not be as noisy and smelly.
912.
by tertius 12y ago
* Portugal does not have full legalization. They have full decriminalization. Not criminal does not mean legal.
913.
by tertius 12y ago
What are some of the "old to you" examples?
914.
by tertius 12y ago
At the very list this will put pressure on others to follow suit.
915.
by tertius 12y ago
A perfect job for the FTC.
916.
by tertius 12y ago
Except when their own interests do not clash with that of those trying to exercise free speech. Which is pretty universally the case. Regulation will now make it harder for those persons who value free speech, we only have "legal speec
917.
by tertius 12y ago
The FTC exists to police competition and consumer protection. TitleII is doomed to fail in court > http://techfreedom.org/post/110086459629/wheeler-ensures-fcc...
918.
by tertius 12y ago
TitleII is not the solution for this problem.
919.
by tertius 12y ago
Rather than being out of the ordinary it needs to pause applause until we know what the rules are. I can't make a solid determination if I agree until I have seen the rules. From what I know already I'm not in favor. I.e. the trep
920.
by tertius 12y ago
* The FCC cannot pass bills, they're generally referred to as rules/regulations.
921.
by tertius 12y ago
Maybe he doesn't want to risk his Karma on this one. Are you suggesting it's some kind of conspiracy?
922.
by tertius 12y ago
> balance free speech needs -- to prevent ISPs and Backbone providers from censoring the content they carry Unless it's not deemed "legal." And I'm not talking about torrenting.
923.
by tertius 12y ago
> because they want to be able to charge a premium for some sites Elaborate on this plan. > and give preferential routing to some kinds of traffic. This is generally how the internet works. When you say "kinds" you mean surg
924.
by tertius 12y ago
I personally think that large financial organizations should have this privilege given their role in the financial markets. They are prone to fraud and theft, i.e. a large target. Except if you have some information that I don't outsid
925.
by tertius 12y ago
No, the writer wants hits to the story. That's how he gets paid.
926.
by tertius 12y ago
Clearly the person who fired her only did so because of public outcry, i.e. the bullying. That was in their best interest. It wasn't fair. It wasn't a consequence equal to her action. It may have been equal to the reaction to her
927.
by tertius 12y ago
* " There are only 5300 broadband internet accounts on the Caribbean island "
928.
by tertius 13y ago
That's not Google's problem, that's the loopholes' problem. Every single entity (including Warren Buffet) will pay the minimum amount of taxes required, i.e. your standard (no higher, no lower) tax burden.
929.
by tertius 13y ago
100% minus 1% is 99%. You thus have less than your principal. I.e. in the hole. It's pretty simple.
930.
by tertius 13y ago
http://vine.co/v/htbdjZAPrAX

More ›