Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tertius
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
46 ms
·
511.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
One thing about the T440p... You can install the i7-4900MQ in it. That should help with the conversion... https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-4900M...
512.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
The T440p is waiting for you...
513.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
Care to share whet eGPU solution you're using?
514.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
Don't forget the sewers.
515.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
Budget is basically equivalent to revenue. Public (government) to private. Value of NASA is quite a bit more than their yearly expenditure.
516.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
Budget, as in expenditure per year no market value.
517.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
Agreed. They focus on deconstruction. So for those who would like to see current events (i.e. through lens of the media) for what they truly are. May be useful for a subset of people who view the mainstream as largely chasing dollars. Which
518.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
Ignorance is bliss as they say.
519.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
> they may have some worthy criticisms at first, but to be worthy to be on their show everything they air must have a huge slant they can fight against, or else they won't talk about it. They call themselves "media analysts&quo
520.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
It's an analogy. Remove your objection of force here to stay on topic. A quote: > if not a majority, of the profits of his service came through being an enabler to criminal activity. He's being realistic on the subject In the s
521.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
Because private property is a cornerstone of a free society? You can't just destroy someone else's property because you have some personal anarchist notion of justice. If they are really being negligent then they should face the p
522.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
The No Agenda show analyses (twice weekly) exactly what you're talking about and compares many sources. They deconstruct the media. They frequently also use European (France 24 and Deutsche Welle) and Asian (like CCTV) to contrast the
523.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
Where do you draw the line? One terrorist attack that was enabled by Signal? Should Signal then be destroyed? Draw the line and we can debate that.
524.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
Inject some nox then perhaps?
525.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
> However leaving such a vulnerability exposed is so bad they deserve to get their entire database dropped (and in this case I hope they don't have backups). I understand the feeling here, but no, they don't deserve to get thei
526.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
It's all about proportion :)
527.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
Offtopic, what's your frontend stack? The pages are super fast!
528.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
I think you're reading too much into it. It's clickbait.
529.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
Collisions?
530.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
Question then: who decides whether someone is "rightly" upset? There is some implication there that we don't need act on every offense taken. For instance, I don't expect others to act (i.e. should be forced to change)
531.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
> The thing I never get with these objections is, what is the harm in raising the point/ making the change? Who loses? A good practice should be to try to find the most convincing voice (online, not just here) with an argument that
532.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
Honest question: Is that how you feel when you type those out?
533.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
Okay, if downvotes is what I get then here's an answer. No, ISPs do not fit under Title II and it's not the way to go to ensure net neutrality. Even congress agrees that Title II was never meant for broadband. Power grab? The abov
534.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
He's arguing that Title II regulation is bad, not net neutrality as a concept. I agree that Title II is the wrong way to go about ensuring or helping ensure net neutrality.
535.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
Public ownership leads to slow or no innovation. Please let this not happen with data infrastructure. I would argue that Congress needs to act, FCC shouldn't be in this.
536.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
[0-2] How does this show that he is against net neutrality?
537.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
I will likely just regurgitate the article I linked. Read it and ask questions if any remain.
538.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
The FCC does not have the power to create law/regulation out of thin air. Congress should act. Ajit Pai is not against net neutrality, but rather against the power grab from the FCC. None of the complaints addresses this. https:/
539.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
Public ownership is where this ends up at.
540.
▲
by
tertius
9y ago
> Characteristics central to capitalism The word "central" here implies that this definition, or summary, does not define capitalism per se.
More ›