> The thing I never get with these objections is, what is the harm in raising the point/ making the change? Who loses? A good practice should be to try to find

> The thing I never get with these objections is, what is the harm in raising the point/ making the change? Who loses? A good practice should be to try to find the most convincing voice (online, not just here) with an argument that answers this question. That's the best route to honesty. If you can't do this then you're not up for debate. This is something we all have to do with all of our arguments or questions. If a question is not investigated it becomes a statement. Just because the person that you're asking cannot come up with a good answer does not mean that a good one does not exist. So you win by make a statement and not asking an honest question.