tempuser24

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by tempuser24 7y ago

   Only Google Pixels if anyone is wondering.
2. 2.▲
   by tempuser24 7y ago

   There are a few local Bitcoin apps and sites. I don't think it would scale well for the FBI to have a sting on every Bitcoin to cash transaction, but would be good to have one on suspected Bitcoin wallets. Although most savvy cybercrim
3. 3.▲
   by tempuser24 7y ago

   My guess would be that Microsoft tipped them off. I couldn't find in the compliant where the IRS or Secret Service got involved, but it does say that Microsoft Fraud Investigators discovered the fraud and fired him.
4. 4.▲
   by tempuser24 7y ago

   There's an interesting org you can become a member of with unlimited 4G data. https://www.calyxinstitute.org/member/map
5. 5.▲
   by tempuser24 7y ago

   There are a few projects for generating onion URLs, probably relatively easy for the CIA. https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/29772/how-do-yo...
6. 6.▲
   by tempuser24 8y ago

   I haven't seen this work around before. Brilliant in it's simplicity.
7. 7.▲
   by tempuser24 8y ago

   I'm not sure I follow, but Cloudflare has a history of being a strong defender of free speech. They even defended Neo-Nazis. https://www.wired.com/story/free-speech-issue-cloudflare/
8. 8.▲
   by tempuser24 8y ago

   When you say the CIA do you mean the Central Intelligence Agency ?
9. 9.▲
   by tempuser24 8y ago

   http://attrition.org/ does this, though it doesn't look like they've kept up with companies.
10. 10.▲
    by tempuser24 8y ago

    Here's a list of recommended ones from OpenWRT https://openwrt.org/toh/recommended_routers . I would assume that they are easy to flash and high compatible.
11. 11.▲
    by tempuser24 8y ago

    I think that in a competitive market you and Pai are right, there would be competition that drives prices down(see cities where Google Fiber entered). Unfortunately wired ISPs is a natural monopolistic market, the cost of entry is extraordi
12. 12.▲
    by tempuser24 8y ago

    I agree with freddie_mecury I am not sure I see the argument or what you mean by "financially secure". But if I can guess at your point I would say that if "financially secure" means having cash then it would make sense
13. 13.▲
    by tempuser24 8y ago

    I think the article did touch on that, and honestly it was a whole big deal just to say "it depends on your situation" and in the associated costs section included break even costs, which I don't think is a good measure.
14. 14.▲
    by tempuser24 8y ago

    Seems like a strategy that the US used for many years, as outlined in the books "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confessions_of_an_Economic_Hit... . I wonder what resources Chi