temporarrry0923

5 ms·

1.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiwi_Farms > Kiwi Farms, formerly known as CWCki Forums, is an American Internet forum dedicated to the discussion of online figures and communities it deems "lolcows" (people
2.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
I can't see that taking off at scale, but certainly in the semipro level it would be used. Besides, I know like 90% of cheaters are 14 year old kids who used the first google result because it's so easy to. Any resistance and that
3.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
Absolutely nothing would happen. I actually did report a few of the accounts just to see what happened and to this day no ban
4.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
>Couldn't figure it out or didn't figure it out? I've reported bugs to the VAC email and they were patched a few weeks later, so maybe they do try? I really can't think of a reason WHY they neglect VAC willingly.. &gt
5.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
>as if it's hard to detect spinbotters Valve couldn't figure it out for years and years. Subtle cheats are absolutely a problem, but far less of a problem for the average new non-prime or fresh trust-factor player than a rage b
6.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
Only with external third parties like Faceit/ESEA. Not normal matchmaking
7.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
>Even if kernel anti-cheats worked perfectly, they still wouldn’t be able to detect newer hardware based cheats which run entirely on a second PC leaving nothing for a kernel level anti-cheat to detect. If it got to this point, to contin
8.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
For sure in other games, yeah. Newell is opposed to kernel anti cheats, though, so probably not in CSGO. But other games now look at CSGO and make kernel AC's a selling point (literally Valorant's selling point), so yeah.
9.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
Yeah I actually almost worked with a ESEA cheat provider that did exactly this. It was a hypervisor that ran the kernel-AC within it. It really subverted my expectations, if you will ;)
10.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
It's not about stopping cheating, it's about stopping the bleeding. Some games have a horrendous cheating problem
11.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
Faceit is really good for an anticheat. It's just that the skill floor is too high to encapsulate casual users, otherwise it would probably kill matchmaking. Cheats cost $60+ and cheat providers get killed often by detection waves
12.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
VACnet catches the spinbotters and aimbotters! Actually really good at it too; everyone who did that now just cheats less hard. The biggest problem was: It didn't auto ban, just sent to overwatch (players watch a past game and vote for
13.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
100% this. Coming from someone who made one myself :p if everyone had to do it to cheat, cheating would be OVER at a casual level, and a minor issue at semipros/pros (even irl tourneys can be hacked! see forsaken).
14.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
That's a small fraction of all cheaters. I was a dev of a free open source cheat and our download rates were insane.
15.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
Absolutely, it's a bezier curve with some random noise, I oversimplified.
16.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
>climbing rapidly up rankings (in a 3rd party ladder) is going to be very suspicious Hard agree here. There's always been people accusing semipros of cheating (see r/VacSucks for more) though, so unless it was pretty concrete,
17.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
Very true. I wasted hundreds of hours doing this, if it takes an extra hour to do, cheating would drop overnight
18.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
>If it's truly identical to aiming by hand, it won't help you Except it's identical to incredible aiming (yet human) skills, which I do not have ;)
19.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
If there's one thing that all cheaters have in common, it's an inflated ego. If the enemy is cheating, and half your teammates are, and it's casual, you're gonna toggle on harder. There is no way to get banned in casual,
20.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
I mean, it has fog of war, yes. It's not as good or strict as it could be. I have seen discussions with the devs and they say that if it is more "strict" (ie hiding player positions until they are closer) would be more taxing
21.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
I wish I could reply to this with a rallying cry for you to keep trying. But it's true, every 14 year old kid with a keyboard can cheat in competitive now.
22.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
>I'd like to see an industry standard anti-cheat root-kit developed as a publicly reviewable open source project at the very least An anti-cheat is one of the few areas that truly would ruin its security by going OSS. A cheater can
23.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
>You can't prevent the client from auto-aiming or knowing the enemy player position behind a nearby wall Valorant and Edan.gg's defender [1] has the best fog of war system I've ever seen. CSGO has probably the worst; in fa
24.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
Pretty well. It doesn't shoot through them, because it can't see through them. Sometimes it aims/shoots through them somewhat early before it dissipates completely, because rxn time is way faster than a human. But it's c
25.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
Yeah, that's understandable. If one of my friends were cheating I think it would be obvious what to do.
26.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
VACnet hurts cheaters, and also probably 25% of legits as well. In low trust this can be verified pretty quickly. Even in the gutter of trust, redder than red, you still have about 50-60% of players cheating. That's nearly half of ever
27.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
I do know this, personally. EAC is not great. They sort of stay on top of things compared to something like CS but it's still possible to get away with it for a few months if you do it right
28.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
Does popflash.site have an AC? I didn't have a problem last time I tested it. I think your server could check for several cvars that are only enabled for cheaters using some cheats, to auto-ban them. Though this precludes externals and
29.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
Or worse machine-learning-to-bounding-box that takes the video stream through HDMI, identifies character heads, intercepts the USB HID mouse, and injects movement commands to move the center of the screen towards the nearest "head&quot
30.
by temporarrry0923 5y ago
I was a kid who always would try to break every system I came across, no matter what it was. I disassembled our FiOS fiber box when I was 11 just to see if I could get us onto the 1Gb plan somehow. I bypassed the "free beta over"

More ›