tempo33

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by tempo33 7y ago

   Then what is empirically wrong with trio programming? If the pair programming wonks actually have data to show that it is a net benefit, then they surely must have evidence showing that 2 is a good maximum on return. Like to this day, I hav
2. 2.▲
   by tempo33 7y ago

   > We think Tree Notation might be the trick to getting the semantic web vision realized. I'm not sure what Tree Notation fundamentally brings to the table that RDF and microformats, etc do not.. Have you read: https://peo
3. 3.▲
   by tempo33 7y ago

   A Z80 running an implementation of lisp is not a lisp machine, sorry. Not an apt comparison. You might want to lookup what a real lisp machine is.
4. 4.▲
   by tempo33 7y ago

   The idea that you need to test with infinite inputs to be "objective" is preposterous. You can in fact test with one input and the result is still objective, and you can conclude that it is objectively terrible or not on that one
5. 5.▲
   by tempo33 7y ago

   Because while XML has types and schemas, the actual implementation and ergonomics is absolute garbage. Those things matter to intelligent people.
6. 6.▲
   by tempo33 7y ago

   No. You can evaluate compiler speed, memory use, quality of error output, generated code quality, ie most of what anyone cares about without knowing what's in it.
7. 7.▲
   by tempo33 7y ago

   Pedantically its WWVB, the LW digital code version, not WWV the SW station. WWV/H/B were at risk for defunding, but their funding was renewed.