Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tempestn
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
91.
▲
by
tempestn
7mo ago
Why does the regular voting system fail here? Are there just too many Show HNs for people to process the new ones, so the good ones get lost in the noise?
92.
▲
by
tempestn
7mo ago
I like to think the machines actually were using them for processing power, and the humans themselves just misunderstood (or oversimplified for Neo) what was actually going on.
93.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
The name is extremely off-putting, but I can see how they would want to be diplomatic toward the administration in using their chosen name. Save the push-back for where it really matters.
94.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
If they had access to them in Ukraine, both sides would already be using them I expect. Right now jamming of drones is a huge obstacle. One way it's dealt with is to run literal wired drones with massive spools of cable strung out behi
95.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
This is great. I particularly enjoyed this entry in the FAQ about how to find web pages: https://info.cern.ch/hypertext/WWW/FAQ/KeepingTrack.html > When (s)he has found an overview page which (s)he feels o
96.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
The one that always gets me is how they're insistent on giving 17-step instructions to any given problem, even when each step is conditional and requires feedback. So in practice you need to do the first step, then report the results,
97.
▲
Nobel laureate invents machine that harvests water from dry air
(theguardian.com)
3 points
by
tempestn
8mo ago
|
0 comments
98.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
Yes and no. The hallucination rate shown there is the percentage of time the model answers incorrectly when it should have instead admitted to not knowing the answer. Most models score very poorly on this, with a few exceptions, because the
99.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
I can only speak to my own experience, but for the past couple of months I've been duplicating prompts across both for high value tasks, and that has been my consistent finding.
100.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
In my experience Gemini 3.0 pro is noticeably better than chatgpt 5.2 for non-coding tasks. The latter gives me blatantly wrong information all the time, the former very rarely.
101.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
It certainly wasn't in the past few weeks, but I've been hearing about how good it's gotten for years. Certainly not planning to pay to find out if it's true now, but I'll give it another try next free trial!
102.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
Based on the self driving trials in my Model Y, I find it terrifying that anyone trusts it to drive them around. It required multiple interventions in a single 10-minute drive last time I tried it.
103.
▲
Tesla Robotaxis Reportedly Crashing at a Rate That's 4x Higher Than Humans
(gizmodo.com)
45 points
by
tempestn
8mo ago
|
12 comments
104.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
Fair. Feels like a month!
105.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
Because Opus 4.5 was released like a month ago and state of the art, and now the significantly faster and cheaper version is already comparable.
106.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
Ah, well, kudos then!
107.
▲
China Floating Turbine Passes Testing and Completes a Grid-Connected Flight
(cleantechnica.com)
1 points
by
tempestn
8mo ago
|
1 comments
108.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
That is a fair point. Especially since, assuming it was AI-generated, it presumably wouldn't have existed at all otherwise.
109.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
Would've been, once. These days I assume bentcorner asked their favourite LLM to generate a poem parodying Ozymandias about once-popular youtube videos.
110.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
I'm in Canada. I do have the pro version though; maybe that makes a difference.
111.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
I think you're missing their point. The question you're replying to is, how do we know that this made up content is a hallucination. Ie., as opposed to being made up by a human. I think it's fairly obvious via Occam's
112.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
I don't think the threat is to leave for 2 years then come back. He just doesn't want to commit to leaving forever . Who knows if in a decade it'll be Android with the shitty keyboard (or Apple will have the better Direct Br
113.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
I'm curious why my experience with Windows 11 is so different from what I regularly read. It was some years ago now, so I don't remember exactly what configuration steps I went through, but presumably I turned off ads when I first
114.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
I've often found when receiving a clueless support response like this, it can be effective to just follow up with a polite request to forward the ticket to an engineer or developer. Usually the front-line csr simply hasn't underst
115.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
That's not surprising. The point isn't to use it to regularly drive tall adults around back there. It's for when your family of four needs to take two of your kids' friends somewhere, that kind of thing. We probably use
116.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
I think insiders would tell you off the record not to get an R1, but that the R2s should be much more robust. Of course it's untested at this point, but hopefully that's the case.
117.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
The only thing I'd miss about the MY is the 7-seat feature. I love the fact that you can technically cram two more people in the car on the occasional times when you need to, without needing to drive a giant 7-seat boat. I wish more mi
118.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
"It also spews garbage into the conversation stream then Claude talks about how it wasn't meant to talk about it, even though it's the one that brought it up." This reminds me of someone else I hear about a lot these day
119.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
The biggest one for me is that Discord will keep all history for free servers, whereas Slack only gives you access to 3 months iirc (and as of a year or two ago, has started permanently deleting older content).
120.
▲
by
tempestn
8mo ago
Agreed. The commas before the sentence-ending 'too' and 'anyway' were perhaps slightly unusual, but not enough so that I even noticed them, and I don't think either is incorrect. All the rest were perfectly normal.
More ›