temp8964

86 ms·

901.
by temp8964 6y ago
> But to others, "politics at work" means "are we paying women and men the same for doing the same job?" and "are our recruiting practices leading to a non-diverse workforce and missing out on great people who sh
902.
by temp8964 6y ago
Read the whole post. They will counsel specific personals, no need for everyone to get involved.
903.
by temp8964 6y ago
Maybe they want to hire people like to work on the things the company do.
904.
by temp8964 6y ago
Good reasoning. So just stay poor, and don't let the big companies make money, this sounds like a great advice to local communities.
905.
by temp8964 6y ago
How is economic growth trickle down for the society? It is not. Strong economic growth is the best thing to level up a society. What is really trickle down for the society? The dead loop between more taxes and economic stagnation.
906.
by temp8964 6y ago
Yes. Useful to the people who use them. Does useful equal to ethical? No.
907.
by temp8964 6y ago
Lol. If cigarettes are truly useless and government wants to ban it, why would anyone want to use it? Usefulness must have a very strange meaning to you.
908.
by temp8964 6y ago
Why investments should be like charitable act? Investments are suppose to be win-win, because they are investments, not handing out money ... Also, it is a very low level misconception that paying local taxes is how you contributing to the
909.
List of Scholarly Publishing Stings(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points by temp8964 6y ago|0 comments
910.
by temp8964 6y ago
They did approve because the research is not a human study, which in my opinion is a correct decision. But, this decision does not endorse the study to be totally ethical, which is a totally different issue.
911.
by temp8964 6y ago
Remember the Sokal Hoax [1] and the New Sokal Hoax [2]? And other publishing stings [3]? How are they different? Honest question. At least those journals did not ban researchers from the whole university... 1. https://en.wikipedi
912.
by temp8964 6y ago
"so long as you are actually capable of doing what is asked"?
913.
by temp8964 6y ago
Right, I do agree structural racism / systemic racism has no meaning, as the great Thomas Sowell pointed out.
914.
by temp8964 6y ago
Are you claiming all the racial disparities in outcomes are caused by the government discrimination?
915.
by temp8964 6y ago
I didn't want to mean the harm was directly caused by the officer. Updated the language.
916.
by temp8964 6y ago
Yeah. This is this judge's over broadening interpretation of the law. If his logic follows, a judge can define any flaw in the society as a state created danger and the judge can create grand plans to fix any societal issues. Lol.
917.
by temp8964 6y ago
> when the government was an active, willing, and knowing participant in creating the conditions that lead to the need for aid. This is known as the “state-created-danger” doctrine. The state-created-danger doctrine does not mean any of
918.
by temp8964 6y ago
Read through and it seems to be a crazy plan for me. The judge appears to be extremely ideology driven and a believer of the critical race theory to his core. It is also laughable to think a judge has a grand plan to solve a societal issue.
919.
by temp8964 6y ago
They use data-forge.js, which has less stars than danfo.js. I can't find any benchmark how they compare to data.table or pandas. Without a dominant and high performance data frame library as a foundation, I wouldn't even try.
920.
Withdraw Notice:The case for colonialism (2017)(tandfonline.com)
2 points by temp8964 6y ago|0 comments
921.
by temp8964 6y ago
Is it now not P.C. to discuss what they revealed? Or "nothing" has been revealed? Are we not allowed to discuss the possibility of someone hacked an university email address and then submit a patch?
922.
by temp8964 6y ago
Where "outed" means something.
923.
by temp8964 6y ago
And they should be outed if they dare to donate to the other side. How dare they!
924.
by temp8964 6y ago
Even there is a priority, I don't think it should be up to the individual prosecutor to make the decision.
925.
by temp8964 6y ago
Prosecutors can choose which law to enforce or not. This doesn't sound good to me at all.
926.
by temp8964 6y ago
No. Study the process is not study the humans involved in the process. No matter how many words you put in there, A != B.
927.
by temp8964 6y ago
Which tweet?
928.
by temp8964 6y ago
How does this link have anything to do with my comments?
929.
by temp8964 6y ago
No. This is not all about the reaction of humans. This is not a psych study. I have explained this clearly in previous comments. If you believe the process of doing something is all about humans, I have nothing to add.
930.
by temp8964 6y ago
See my top comment. I didn't "try to excuse the researchers behavior as ethical".

More ›