> when the government was an active, willing, and knowing participant in creating the conditions that lead to the need for aid. This is known as the “state-crea

> when the government was an active, willing, and knowing participant in creating the conditions that lead to the need for aid. This is known as the “state-created-danger” doctrine. The state-created-danger doctrine does not mean any of those [1,2]. The law is about direct physical harm by the inaction of individual officers, not any vague policy implications. This judge's interpretation of the law is as crazy as his ideology. 1 https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/legal-doctrine-of-state-created-danger-and-police-liability-38300 https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/legal-doctrine-of-state-cr... 2 https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2495&context=faculty_scholarship https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article...