Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tectonic
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
331.
▲
The Orbital Index is a weekly technical newsletter about the space industry
(orbitalindex.com)
3 points
by
tectonic
6y ago
|
0 comments
332.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
Pros: competition with Starlink, more Internet connectivity for the world. Cons: this + Starlink + OneWeb make wide-field Earth-based astronomy much harder, making it less likely that we'll notice new astronomic phenomena or inbound ci
333.
▲
DARPA is working on nuclear thermal propulsion systems
(orbitalindex.com)
1 points
by
tectonic
6y ago
|
0 comments
334.
▲
Venus Has Active Volcanoes
(orbitalindex.com)
1 points
by
tectonic
6y ago
|
0 comments
335.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
The Bobiverse series
336.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
Awesome, considered KubOS?
337.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
I was just thinking how GPT-3 could be that novel's method of generating so much noise as to inoculate everyone against astroturfing.
338.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
Correct, along with a bunch of other deep space craft. See my comment down thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23954547
339.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
I fell down a Wikipedia Hole deep into the history of nuclear reactors in space. There are many radioisotope heater units (RHUs) in space, such as those used by Chang'e 4 to survive the cold lunar nights, and radioisotope thermoelectri
340.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
GPT3 isn’t generally able to cite sources and tends to confabulate realistic but incorrect answers to questions. It’s great as an ideation tool, much less so as a search engine.
341.
▲
Like Grep but for Code
(semgrep.live)
3 points
by
tectonic
6y ago
|
0 comments
342.
▲
DARPA is building Nuclear Thermal Propulsion
(orbitalindex.com)
2 points
by
tectonic
6y ago
|
0 comments
343.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
There's a big list of similar resources at Awesome Space: https://github.com/orbitalindex/awesome-space
344.
▲
Space Based Manufacturing is spinning up
(orbitalindex.com)
1 points
by
tectonic
6y ago
|
0 comments
345.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
Thanks for the suggestion, I'll change that.
346.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
See also: https://github.com/jsdf/pce
347.
▲
Windows98 Running in the Browser
(copy.sh)
421 points
by
tectonic
6y ago
|
266 comments
348.
▲
Comparing NASA's new Perseverance rover to Curiosity
(orbitalindex.com)
2 points
by
tectonic
6y ago
|
0 comments
349.
▲
A Viper on the Moon
(orbitalindex.com)
2 points
by
tectonic
6y ago
|
0 comments
350.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
Checkout SpaceX's Reddit AMA from last week: https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1853ap/we_are_spacex_...
351.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
We're finding exoplanets at an incredible rate. See NASA's Exoplanet Archive ( https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/ ) for the current 4164 known exoplanets. Related: The Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile jus
352.
▲
The Orbital Index, a weekly technical newsletter about the space industry
(orbitalindex.com)
1 points
by
tectonic
6y ago
|
0 comments
353.
▲
10 Years of Falcon 9
(orbitalindex.com)
3 points
by
tectonic
6y ago
|
0 comments
354.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
See also e-sail: https://orbitalindex.com/archive/2019-04-09-archive-Issue-7/
355.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
Good writeup! In general, the direction in modern aerospace is to use COTS (commercial off-the-shelf) parts with redundancy and failback for radiation hardening. If you’re into this sort of thing, I co-write a weekly newsletter about the sp
356.
▲
The Orbital Index
(orbitalindex.com)
1 points
by
tectonic
6y ago
|
0 comments
357.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
Yes, lots of opportunities in data science, fintech, and software!
358.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
Yes, there were likely other costs, but from NASA's perspective, their costs were way lower. For example, for their first investment of $396M in commercial cargo deliveries to the ISS with SpaceX, they got the development of the Cargo
359.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
This is a huge success for NASA's Commercial Crew Program. Both the total development costs ($1.7B and $2.8B for Crew Dragon and Starliner, respectively) and the per-seat costs ($60-67M and $91-99M) have outperformed all other NASA cre
360.
▲
by
tectonic
6y ago
If you're into space science and technology and want to see where we're going next, check out https://orbitalindex.com , a weekly space science & technology newsletter that I co-write.
More ›