techinformed56

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by techinformed56 8y ago

   +1 I felt this article is more about how to use microservices right way vs butchering the idea. It is not right to characterize this as microservices vs monolith service. Initial version of their attempt went too far by spinning up a servic
2. 2.▲
   by techinformed56 9y ago

   Yandex.taxi is a service provided by Yandex. The deal talks nothing about licesing agreement for Yandex infrastructure (maps etc). So the claim you make above is under premise that ride sharing will not make money at all and money spend on
3. 3.▲
   by techinformed56 9y ago

   If you read other articles you can see that Uber spent 170M in Russia till now. Along with this 225M its a total 395M of spending. And now they got 36.6% stake in a company (now a leader in Russia) worth 3.4B. So Uber got 1.4B. How is that
4. 4.▲
   by techinformed56 9y ago

   Fair enough! But what do you say of this article in NYT today on this ruling? https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/15/technology/uber-self-driv... Selectively quoting only stuff about Engineer and not quotin
5. 5.▲
   by techinformed56 9y ago

   But I do agree with media bias. The main case was "Injunction". Not a case against Anthony. "Actual case" was Waymo seeking protection for what they claim 121 trade secrets and hence prevent Uber from dong self driving t