tdhoot

15 ms·

121.
by tdhoot 8y ago
The being that states cannot enter in a compact with each other on how to allocate their votes without Congressional approval. I guess if each state individually decides this would be an interesting constitutional question.
122.
by tdhoot 8y ago
What are the alternatives that are credible and widely accepted? No offense meant, but your comment as is just reads as talking down to someone without actual attempting to educate.
123.
by tdhoot 8y ago
Googles inclination to deprecate products is common knowledge at this point. What value is added by restating the obvious in every Google related thread?
124.
by tdhoot 8y ago
Doesn’t repeating this trope on every Google related topic get old? We get it, they cancel projects. Hahaha?
125.
The Privacy Project(nytimes.com)
2 points by tdhoot 8y ago|0 comments
126.
by tdhoot 8y ago
Wow, how is this comment not getting more notice. This is a hilarious screw-up. Seems like the NYT is launching a new privacy initiative tomorrow.
127.
by tdhoot 8y ago
This is futile for the time being. Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution provides that "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress... enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State“ Given Trump has public
128.
by tdhoot 8y ago
No, it couldn't affect ICE since the federal government has sovereign immunity and all federal officials enjoy qualified immunity in the course of conducting federal business.
129.
by tdhoot 8y ago
It doesn't infringe on anything unless you believe everyone must make the same choices you've made. If your employer is making you work long hours because someone else is, that's on your employer, not the employee who is volu
130.
by tdhoot 8y ago
Comparing these places to the Bay Area would probably be more appropriate.
131.
by tdhoot 8y ago
> If you can't make yourself stand out with the same amount of hours as your coworkers, then maybe you should come to terms with the fact that you just aren't exceptional. Or perhaps different people prioritize different things
132.
by tdhoot 8y ago
This sort of reasoning by a hiring manager would be a great example of bias against white people.
133.
by tdhoot 8y ago
How is this gaslighting?
134.
Alphabet’s Chronicle Finally Launches–It’s Like Google Photos for Cybersecurity(forbes.com)
5 points by tdhoot 8y ago|0 comments
135.
by tdhoot 8y ago
> As you said, previously some airlines would take the pressure off by hiring commercial pilots and getting them hours as copilots. Do copilot hours really count? I thought you had to be pilot in command?
136.
by tdhoot 8y ago
That $7.50 pays to cover capital costs (the car). Uber would have to also pay for that out of their share. The general point is that the savings might not be enough to offset the higher capital costs from autonomous vehicles + development s
137.
by tdhoot 8y ago
I don't think you can chargeback years later, it's usually 45-120 days.
138.
by tdhoot 8y ago
To be clear, a corporate inversion is generally used to reduce taxes. I believe when you're simply doing it to avoid the IPO process it's just called a backdoor listing.
139.
by tdhoot 8y ago
I wonder what they do if someone can't pay. The system doesn't seem too different from the US to be honest, in that people with poor financial planning skills may decide to skip on insurance premiums and end up not having enough m
140.
by tdhoot 8y ago
Unless there is interest or a penalty then you can take all the premiums you've saved + interest and just pay them.
141.
by tdhoot 8y ago
Source on Canada letting you pay for your own healthcare? It's usually prohibited.
142.
by tdhoot 8y ago
I'm Canadian and as far as I know you don't have a private option in most provinces. The only option is to travel to the United States and pay for it yourself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Canad
143.
by tdhoot 8y ago
>> Japan has a clever way to handle the mandate. If you don't pay your premiums, nothing happens, but if you need healthcare you're not covered until you pay your back premiums. Wouldn't it always be a good idea to not
144.
by tdhoot 8y ago
The case was Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis. Not Susan Fowler's appeal, but her lawyers filed a brief in support.
145.
by tdhoot 8y ago
I'm not sure if we're speaking past each other, but it seems we're both making the same point. The right is not advocating for the complete destruction of the Government. The left is not advocating for the removal of corp
146.
by tdhoot 8y ago
The equivalent opinion of "disband one agency" is not a "Worker's Revolution", it's "disband one corporation/industry", and there are plenty of those opinions on the left (tech monopolies, oil&#x
147.
by tdhoot 8y ago
There are some reasons on StackOverflow. There's an answer by someone from QZ specifically, who says it's only shown when you visit from an outside referrer and it's so you can skip all the content if you're not interest
148.
by tdhoot 8y ago
Correct. Germany is an economic powerhouse, but lacks military might and therefore power projection.
149.
by tdhoot 8y ago
The EU is wealthy but has limited power projection. Only France and the UK can realistically be considered great powers, and even then not on the scale of the US, China, or Russia.
150.
by tdhoot 8y ago
This is common worldwide, I think. Ryanair in Europe and Spirit in the US come to mind. Spirit actually sells ads on everything it seems, even on the exterior of the plane: https://skift.com/2014/03/11/spirit-

More ›