Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tcrenshaw
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
3y ago
Great write up. I'm thinking about building out a new work from home space and I'm definitely going to be copying some of your ideas.
32.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
Can you elaborate on this? I'm interested in the pinetab 2 and already own a pinebook.
33.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
I work on my projects the same way. Enjoy the little wins when I get them; put it down in favor of another project for a while if I get bored.
34.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
How else would you suggest they do it? Demand has out placed the supply, it's either they charge a shitload, putting it out of reach for all but the elites, or put it behind a lottery.
35.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
In my experience, geosat is reliable until it rains. Then your slow speeds drop down to nothing. TBF, I've not used starlink yet.
36.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
I was so excited for mugsy when it was first announced. I check back in every year or so only to be shocked he's still chugging away. I can't imagine there are many people that still expect him to deliver
37.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
what's the community recommendation these days?
38.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
Just double checked my jack settings; I'm running my interface at 48000hz with a buffer size of 128 and 2 periods for a theoretical latency of 5.33ms. I'm sure USB adds a fraction of a millisecond as well.
39.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
My normal chain is a noise gate, followed by a comp, a little emulated tube drive, an SVT amp model, an impulse response modeled cab simulator (of course running a 8x12 SVT cab), a plate reverb, and a limiter. I've got some crazier one
40.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
Nah, low latency audio is absolutely possible, but not necessarily using pulse audio. Using either Jack for the low latency stuff has been the advice for years, but with the advent of pipewire you can mix and match without too much difficul
41.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
While I agree it's ridiculous to continue selling a device with Android 9 in 2023, the atom was released in 2018. The newer Jelly 2e runs android 12 and is a similar form factor. I've had high hopes for unihertz phones, but have y
42.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
Most, if not all, of the class D amps at the large scale pro audio level have that DSP built into the amplifier itself. More and more speaker manufacturers are also selling their own amplifiers (not necessarily made in house) with limiting
43.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
I'm a home assistant user that's been following along with the year of voice. I played a little with Almond and some with Rhasspy; what's the best way to get up and running right now? I've been using my arch desktop with
44.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
I can vouch for crowdview as well. Discovered it a few weeks ago and it does a great job at cutting through the typical search bullshit when you want human responses
45.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
It sounds like OP already has this implemented, but Adaptive Lighting is one of the best parts of my Home Assistant setup. Adaptive Lighting automatically changes your lights brightness and color temp (for capable bulbs), from full brightne
46.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
I consider myself a Linux power user at this point; been running Linux as my primary os since 2007. I enjoy tinkering, but I like my distro to be rock solid; all of my Linux servers run debian stable. In no way would I say that you're
47.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
I like my bangle.js2, but I loved my pebble. If only the bangle had more physical buttons.
48.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
Have you looked at syncthing? I believe it ticks off all your boxes. I'm using it to sync my obsidian vault and Todo list between multiple android, Windows, and Linux devices and it Just Works. I do have an always on server running it
49.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
I'll add that I prefer mainsail's ui to octoprint, but functionally they're basically equivalent, though I'll cede that Octoprint probably comes out on top as far as integrations. I had my Octoprint instance set so that
50.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
Has octoprint improved its slicer? From what I remember and accorded to a quick web search [1], the inbuilt slicer has been abandoned. For me, an inbuilt slicker would be worth mixing octoprint and Klipper firmware. As an aside, I've b
51.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
Quote from a klipper's benefits page I found [1] "Klipper uses the extra computing power and built-in algorithms to better calculate step movement times for motor actions, achieving movement precision of 25 microseconds or lower.
52.
▲
by
tcrenshaw
4y ago
I've been browsing Hacker News for several years now and this is the post that pushed me into making an account, just to comment here. Klipper is a better choice in almost every way. It actually uses the CPU of your pi to improve the p