Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tcfhgj
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
30 ms
·
721.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
you are like me
722.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
Commercial unrequested ads in general, they are designed to manipulate you to make you buy products you wouldn't have bought otherwise. Additionally, a related negative side effect is consumerism.
723.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
Don't start, please
724.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
I am not interested in paying Google for anything. It's a company too big and powerful through immoral business (ads) I block all ads and wish commercial ads would cease to exist even though it would mean I couldn't use somethings
725.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
Besides it's a crime against the environment: The user doesn't have a choice
726.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
> Please just let us bundle a modern chrome with our apps. please, no. I wish software companies had to pay the hardware they require for their users, then we would have devs using Rust instead of JS and optimizing using ASM just to save
727.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
> Not using a DI framework is simple at the beginning, but it grows, possibly exponentially, and at some point crosses the line of constant complexity from a DI framework. How so?
728.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
I have a rotating knob on the micro wave, no manual digital input although it's only a few years old. Fwiw it could be a decade or two old And I am happy with it. Pretty much prefer it to using buttons. Just rotate it to about 30, done
729.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
Google search without ads... uBlock Origin
730.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
> 3. Server - You accept media from unknown sources, so you are sandboxed anyway. Losing 5% of computing resources adds up to big $ over a year and at enough scale. At Youtube for example it could be millions of dollars a year of compute
731.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
> people are told to always clone when learning, why isn't this semantics built into the language? Because cloning as opposed to copying is expensive and it generates a new instance of a type. In C, you don't clone, you simply
732.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
> why would anyone want to do otherwise? lying to yourself is sometimes a easy way out of cognitive dissonance
733.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
Powershell has this, why do you like this?
734.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
No
735.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
would you consider panics acceptable when you think it cannot panic in practice? e.g. unwraping/expecting a value for a key in a map when you inserted that value before and know it hasn't been removed? you could have a panic tho
736.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
if you want bulk, you can use arrays, vecs, arenas, etc.
737.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
And how should resources be managed?
738.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
I don't feel like the template itself is the issue. In typst it's quite easy to recreate the templates without being years into typst (according to my experience). The real problem is acceptance of non-word/latex papers
739.
▲
by
tcfhgj
1y ago
For the applications, you can use NixOS and git
740.
▲
by
tcfhgj
2y ago
Aren't stdlib functions the ones you know by heart after a while anyways?
741.
▲
by
tcfhgj
2y ago
Why would you say that?
742.
▲
by
tcfhgj
2y ago
async mutexes? > Contrary to popular belief, it is ok and often preferred to use the ordinary Mutex from the standard library in asynchronous code. > The feature that the async mutex offers over the blocking mutex is the ability to ke
743.
▲
by
tcfhgj
2y ago
How many could potentially discover security vulnerabilities in your code vs popular lib?
744.
▲
by
tcfhgj
2y ago
hmm Rust as well: let [car, cdr @ ..] = [1,2,3];
745.
▲
by
tcfhgj
2y ago
> You can say would prefer to just pay full price for it and avoid the ads, but most people clearly would not like to when given the option. Truth is, you pay the full price anyways, because the money earned through ads is also paid by y
746.
▲
by
tcfhgj
2y ago
We don't know, we just can't imagine
747.
▲
by
tcfhgj
2y ago
> made far more rational decisions than its EU neighbors (having correctly prioritized energy security, military, and technology Because there is one objectively correct way to prioritize /s
748.
▲
by
tcfhgj
2y ago
Not necessarily, you could give restricted access to a client
749.
▲
by
tcfhgj
2y ago
Can you expand and provide sources?
750.
▲
by
tcfhgj
2y ago
Why?
More ›