Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tboyd47
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
68 ms
·
751.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
Hi there. I am currently exploring this same idea myself and I’m well on my way. Shoot me an email if you want to chat. Temp email: dithonilat@mybx.site
752.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
Those "mobs" are only ordinary people exercising their own freedom of expression online. I think a more correct sentiment would be that even when there are governments that don't want to limit freedom of expression, multinati
753.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
So you realized that your typing surface is too high. You have 2 options: 1. Lower your typing surface. 2. Raise your seat. #1 can be handled with a clamp-on keyboard tray (get one with negative tilt), and for #2, try a drafting stool (don&
754.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
I get that, it just strikes me as ridiculous that a curriculum about how to use the internet to learn would be summed up by: "Google, Wikipedia." Maybe the author is sacrificing too much depth here and I'm missing the overall
755.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
Being "friendly" and "well-liked" sound like the kinds of goals children would come up with on their own because they crave attention and positive reinforcement, not what adults should be teaching them.
756.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
"How to be a friendly, well-liked person" is not a "social skill." "How to use the Internet to learn: Google, Wikipedia." This is "learning about learning" to you?
757.
▲
Ask HN: How did your software team scale up or scale down?
2 points
by
tboyd47
7y ago
|
1 comments
758.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
> turn a 30 minute task into a 3 hour task Not a bad thing at all. If he is an engineer, it is due diligence, which is in fact his job. > a 1 week task can turn into a 3 month task This is more of a management problem than a personal
759.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
It's not strange, it's laughably pathetic. This is how they want consumers to feel about 5G- bursting with anticipation and begging our corporate overlords for it.
760.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
Why not just put your resume out there and see what happens?
761.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
The fact that he had to work at night in order to get any concentration time would be a company culture fail in most situations. But, the devil's in the details. > David Kushner reflected on the unconventional working style of the c
762.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
Some chairs cut off circulation or physically block proper posture. When so much "ergonomic design" is counterproductive, as the article details, it's worth it to be selective w/r/t equipment.
763.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
The chair looks awesome but unfortunately it's only 1/4 of the problem. Schools need to change desks, keyboards, and the equipment itself, too.
764.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
Hey man, I really like the research you're doing on HN. Thought about starting a blog?
765.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
There's also the hiding-in-plain sight explanation that C was just easier than Lisp for English-speaking people to learn and use because, like English, it's SVO instead of VSO. Then object-oriented languages overtook C for the sam
766.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
Wait, don't turn tech debt into a climate change thing. That's our word! I can just hear the Backlog Grooming conversations... Devs: "When are we going to schedule time for tech debt? We haven't done any chores in 3 mont
767.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
Thanks. I was looking for more info on this extremely strange case. It's hard to find after the gag order.
768.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
Then what is the new Rails?
769.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
> The WEF assumes many people born recently will live beyond 100, which may be a bit much (the Social Security Administration expects most Americans born today to live into their mid-80s). The title of the WEF paper is "We’ll Live t
770.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
I skimmed the article (it's quite long) found the criticisms weak. > No data published; for Szmigielski (1996) it is implied that there were two to three brain tumors in the exposed group, in which case we imply that the 95% CI for
771.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
Agreed. The "correlation != causation" mantra does not match the context here. It's true that correlation studies are not as conclusive as laboratory experiments in general, but when we're talking about negative long-ter
772.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8717316
773.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
Thank you. The sheer volume of blatantly false comments on this thread is astounding to me.
774.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
It's not a solution looking for a problem. The problem is that the existing infrastructure does not support network slicing. Without network slicing the telcos are severely limited in their pricing models. "5G" is just them t
775.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
This comment is utterly false. Just after a brief glance at the paper, I found a study on showing a 2x increase in cancer on a sample size of over 1,000,000 humans.
776.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
Here's a longitudinal study on about 55,000 Polish military personnel found in the article: "The cancer morbidity rate for RF/MW-exposed personnel for all age groups (20-59 years) reached 119.1 per 100,000 annually (57.6 in n
777.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
Well, it might be unsophisticated of me to belabor my point, but it doesn't take a genius to see that there are major technical drawbacks with 5G, and the industry has not been successful in convincing consumers to buy into the hype. T
778.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
Right, so far we've learned: 1) 5G improves wireless internet - though it only works over short-range and can't go through walls. 2) 5G needs a massive deployment of new devices to reach consumers - though most consumers are not w
779.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
> the use-case for this range is when there is NO obstacles to go through (it does not really work otherwise...) So, on the one hand, 5G is going to make unicorns fly down and carry us to the heavens on wings of pure data, and on the oth
780.
▲
by
tboyd47
7y ago
Are you aware of any longitudinal studies on the effect of wireless internet (or even electricity in general) on human health to prove your point?
More ›