tavavex

52 ms·

901.
by tavavex 3y ago
Yeah, that's a worse look for NASA in that case. Still, I'm confused - why would NASA agree to do this in the first place?
902.
by tavavex 3y ago
Nothing in the form seems out of the ordinary to me. It is a lot of fields, but ultimately the main goal is establishing ownership, not discerning the specific methodology in which a person made the work. It's a departure in that the c
903.
by tavavex 3y ago
Just because the pace of progress isn't exponential (like what some people would want to believe) doesn't mean it isn't happening. I remember getting an early invite to DALL-E 1 all the way back, and while I don't use it
904.
by tavavex 3y ago
> It is for the sake of copyright, if you want society to protect your work, provide evidence for your creative work. I'm not sure if it's that simple - for one, this requirement is a complete departure from how copyright syste
905.
by tavavex 3y ago
This seems like a really strange objection. It's one thing if this was directly harmful to any real human beings, but the alleged harm here is purely symbolic. There are probably religions in this world for which the mere fact of going
906.
by tavavex 3y ago
I'm a bit confused - you draw parallels between artists whose work gets used in a training dataset and musicians who sign contracts with Spotify, but the comparison is very strained. The financial link with Spotify is obvious - the com
907.
by tavavex 3y ago
I'm kind of confused - you've claimed that Google's AI was broken, but cite an anecdote over ChatGPT? Regardless, even if these cases did happen often enough, it's erroneous to assume that this is something universal (i.
908.
by tavavex 3y ago
I'm really struggling to conceptualize a world where every picture that's drawn must have a full notary log of how exactly it was produced, all for the sake of removing generative AI. Besides, it's not that easy of a problem
909.
by tavavex 3y ago
I'm not really sure how this connects to the argument. No one is trying to grant authorship to an algorithm - it would be a ridiculous effort that was never even in the cards. In these copyright disputes, the authorship on AI outputs w
910.
by tavavex 3y ago
> Anyone trying to hide it would be spending time equivalent to just making the art themselves. The gap of being distinguishable from manually drawn images is still closing - we don't know if it'll ever reach the threshold, but
911.
by tavavex 3y ago
You can publish these models in all jurisdictions, including ones that do care about IP law. There's no rulings saying that models trained on datasets of images are direct derivatives of the original images (in a way that's copyri
912.
by tavavex 3y ago
It's really strange how "football fields" or "Olympic swimming pools" etc became such common comparison points for news headlines. Isn't the universality kind of the appeal of having units of measurement? I&#x2
913.
by tavavex 3y ago
I think this article refers to some areas rising enough to have the coast move back by about 250m, not to an increase in length of the entire Japanese coastline.
914.
by tavavex 3y ago
Well, yes, the plane did burn down almost completely. The quote I heard that complimented it wasn't that it wasn't flammable, but that it (again, allegedly - I'm not a material scientist) insulated the interior from the fire
915.
by tavavex 3y ago
The plane faring better in the collision than expected and, allegedly, not burning through quickly and buying the passengers more time to evacuate.
916.
by tavavex 3y ago
I was especially impressed to see that this was rolled out on an entire 3.5km-long loop, rather than some small localized attraction. It's interesting not just because of the engineering that was done, but because it shows what 1900 pe
917.
by tavavex 3y ago
1. The 737 is so ubiquitous that they didn't want to create something new. They wanted old 737 pilots to be almost automatically certified to fly their new aircraft, and they wanted all the 737-oriented equipment to keep working. So, i
918.
by tavavex 3y ago
Allegedly, some of it can be attributed to the extensive use of carbon fiber in the A350s fuselage and wings.
919.
by tavavex 3y ago
Eh, considering wind speed and direction (and its differences at different altitudes), varying pressure and inherent aerodynamic properties of the door plug itself, it's hardly a high school problem. They'll find a decent estimate
920.
by tavavex 3y ago
Low n is pretty unavoidable here, considering how few aircraft generally get made. Even for the world's leading manufacturers, deliveries are counted in units per month. The point here is that the aviation industry is one of the most r
921.
by tavavex 3y ago
I assume that a lot of people here want to avoid the 737s not necessarily because they're scared for their lives, but as a way to show disapproval to Boeing. Like, I won't avoid flying a 737 Max if it's the only option for fl
922.
by tavavex 3y ago
I feel like this is pretty unlikely - as far as I know, they don't really pass news bulletins and such to pilots, if it's not something that they need to know. Besides, even if some passenger found out, what could they even do?
923.
by tavavex 3y ago
That is pretty concerning. The way how Boeing can get its way simply by threatening to can the entire MAX program (which they'd never actually do) shows that there's a very deep level of integration between the US government and i
924.
by tavavex 3y ago
> This is a common fallacy, that having access to the source gives you the legal right to do what you want with it, and that is not correct. The license must be followed regardless of whether it's accessible to the public. This isn&
925.
by tavavex 3y ago
> If people who reverse engineer things like Windows APIs can be sued simply because they have viewed leaked Windows source code and may implement something similar to it, on accident, I think "AI" should be held to the same st
926.
by tavavex 3y ago
To me this seems like another "protest piece" for people that really hate AI, rather than something useful. It's like one of those "No to AI art" images that people spammed on websites hosting any AI-generated conte
927.
by tavavex 3y ago
> If a human did what models are doing, it would be considered plagiarism at best. They wouldn't, and that's the issue. If I looked at a thousand drawings done in a certain, specific style and used my findings to make my own un
928.
by tavavex 3y ago
The "metaverse" and a lot of cryptocurrencies were always explicit grifts with the purpose of making money for someone. Metaverse (specifically, Meta's vision of one) relied on them making meaningless digital accessories and
929.
by tavavex 3y ago
> I think that depends on the application of "designed to simulate human intelligence" (Definition "b").. If that statement does not apply to the previously mentioned "algorithms" in the definition, I think
930.
by tavavex 3y ago
Makes me wonder - how viable is it to install actual SteamOS on devices that aren't the Steam Deck (and use the Deck UI and all)? Are there any mods or something to make that work?

More ›