taspeotis

161 ms·

1771.
by taspeotis 13y ago
It's caused tremendous cost to the business Presumably you guys didn't have backups? If so, why not? Section 14 of Box's terms indicate IN ALL CAPS SO IT MUST BE IMPORTANT that they offer no warranty that the software will
1772.
by taspeotis 13y ago
Do these guys even know their own name? From Powerful data models and queries : > With backeam you can model Emphasis mine. It's not even a quickly-typed email from a company rep, it's the front page of their website.
1773.
by taspeotis 13y ago
A lot of "unofficial fan based" projects seem to be tolerated by the IP owners while there's no money involved, even if they get quite large. These guys are asking for $400,000. Anyone taking bets on how long until we see som
1774.
Building an API for the next 100 million developers(ustream.tv)
1 points by taspeotis 13y ago|0 comments
1775.
by taspeotis 13y ago
I agree. It's only remarkable from a public relations point of view. Following the case it was suggested by Struan Robertson – editor of Out-Law.com – that Microsoft had little choice but to pursue the issue once it had come to light
1776.
by taspeotis 13y ago
Took quite a bit of Googling, but it looks like it's optimistic concurrency control.
1777.
by taspeotis 13y ago
It's been a while since I've read the article, but I skimmed over it and didn't really get that vibe from it. I felt it was more "these guys are extreme outliers in terms of software quality, but also extreme outliers in
1778.
by taspeotis 13y ago
Seeing this article reminds me of http://www.fastcompany.com/28121/they-write-right-stuff
1779.
by taspeotis 13y ago
Australian here. Government departments are slowly starting to catch on to this sort of thing. One application I work on stores data from DEEWR and FaHCSIA and this year they've "cracked down" on that data going overseas. The