tariqali34

8 ms·

1.
by tariqali34 3y ago
The difference is that you aren’t the one coming up with the search terms, browsing through all the search results, and then selecting the specific results you want to explore further. You let the Web Browsing model do all that work for you
2.
by tariqali34 3y ago
If you have ChatGPT Plus, you get access to the Web Browsing model, which allows ChatGPT access to the Internet. Not only do you get an audit log for all the sites ChatGPT visit, you also get citations as well for any sources it does end up
3.
by tariqali34 4y ago
> Ever since the AI hype started this year, one thing that's always really bugged me is talk about "safety" around AI. Everyone is so worried about AI's ability to write fake news and how "dangerous" that ca
4.
Public Split on Basic Income for Workers Replaced by Robots(news.gallup.com)
4 points by tariqali34 9y ago|0 comments
5.
by tariqali34 10y ago
"The fact that a language is new means that nearly everyone, except for the creator and early dogfooders, is new to it, which means they come to it with roughly the same perspective (and needs and wants) as anyone who is curious to jum
6.
by tariqali34 10y ago
No, putting everything in the public domain and handing out a UBI doesn't solve anything at all. It's like worrying about nukes and believing the best solution is to give everyone nukes (AI) and nuclear bunkers (UBI), because &quo
7.
by tariqali34 10y ago
I agree with you, igk. AI is a threat right now and has to be countered. Now the problem is: is there an organization dedicated to countering current AI trends through government regulations to slow down AI research and prevent AI misuse?
8.
Show HN: Prolefeed, Ruby gem to generate stories using pre-made content(github.com)
3 points by tariqali34 10y ago|0 comments
9.
by tariqali34 10y ago
And this would explain why the CEO supports a Basic Income. He is already thinking about what will happen to him once he is obsolete...
10.
The Death of the Software Engineer(medium.com)
3 points by tariqali34 10y ago|2 comments
11.
by tariqali34 10y ago
I'm doubtful that Hacker News would tolerate autoposts. But it would make for an excellent "Show HN" sideproject that somebody can make to boost their coding skills.
12.
by tariqali34 10y ago
Interestingly, I really liked [spoiler] too, but I also hoped that this blog post could be reused in future language fights (and it is a shame that [spoiler] could prevent that). Potentially a revised version of this blog post could be help
13.
Why I Left [Language_1] for [Language_2](medium.com)
21 points by tariqali34 10y ago|10 comments
14.
by tariqali34 10y ago
> Experienced people often forget the learning curve when they were themselves beginners, and at that time Rails was so attractive, so sexy. Remember that feeling? Of accomplishment in the face of the knowledge that some nice witch left
15.
by tariqali34 10y ago
Reminds me of "The programming language lifecycle"[1] (written in 2006), which essentially implies that the reason programmers continually search for new languages is simply out of a desire to 'distinguish' themselves fr
16.
When we hype our science, discoveries are diminished(theglobeandmail.com)
3 points by tariqali34 10y ago|0 comments
17.
by tariqali34 10y ago
The only jobs that probably won't be automated away is programming. Even if you build layers and layers of abstraction, you still have to code on top of the highest layer...and debug the machines when they go wrong (and they will go
18.
by tariqali34 10y ago
Not all those downloads are for actual projects. Many people have set up their own private "npm repositories" so that if they actually need to use a node package, they can just download from their private repos rather than downloa
19.
Dot-com party madness (2000)(salon.com)
3 points by tariqali34 10y ago|1 comments
20.
by tariqali34 10y ago
Why do you think the march will stop then? Since machines are better at humans, why wouldn't the hypothetical corporation simply fire the corporate CEO and replace him with a machine?
21.
by tariqali34 10y ago
I don't know. But I think that if we ever get to that point, then it would probably lead to a doomsday scenario of existential angst. Anything that happens after that...is really a boring footnote in the history of machinery's tr
22.
by tariqali34 10y ago
Why would those be purposes? A single person may want to contemplate, laugh, love, bliss, etc., but it's not a justification for his/her existence. And it would be remarkably egoistic and empty if I want to enjoy a hedonistic li
23.
by tariqali34 10y ago
"Futurologists have been multiplying like flies since the day Herman Kahn made Cassandra's profession "scientific," yet somehow not one of them has come out with the clear statement that we have wholly abandoned ourselve
24.
by tariqali34 10y ago
We're actively hiring too. If you need a job, just visit our website at http://example.com . No need to explain how much we'll pay you per year, how long the interview process is, how likely it is that we'll hire y
25.
by tariqali34 10y ago
I like to see that sort of tool too (though not enough to actually code it, being already exhausted after this project). Does Reddit have an API that exposes the points of a post, thereby allowing you to save only the posts that are of high
26.
Show HN: StackAI, Aggregator of StackExchange Questions on AI(stackai.herokuapp.com)
7 points by tariqali34 10y ago|2 comments
27.
by tariqali34 10y ago
And since we don't know how humans decide their own goals (because knowing that would be a very revolutionary discovery that would immediately be used in a variety of other fields, including politics and advertising), we can never real
28.
by tariqali34 10y ago
I'm not sure. That's why we need to come up with a good, rigorous definition that doesn't elevates humanity, but is instead an objective, reasonable definition of intelligence that humans can agree upon. I'm doubtful tha
29.
by tariqali34 10y ago
>I can't understand the cognitive dissonance that makes a person marvel at how "amazing the brain is" while simultaneously ignore the suffering of billions of those brains. I can. Humans are good at coming up with brillian
30.
Architect: A Postmortem of a Short Story Generator(tra38.github.io)
2 points by tariqali34 10y ago|0 comments

More ›