Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tabeth
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
34 ms
·
331.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
> For a man talking to a man, all of the above are just plain fine. Really? I wouldn't do most of your examples, personally. I'm curious if I'm the weird one here.
332.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
Why wouldn't you treat everyone the same?
333.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
I'm curious: would you call a man sweetie?
334.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
I honestly don't know what all the fuss is about? Is it that difficult to just treat women -- not nicely -- but equally? This is kindergarten level stuff, people. Keep your hands to yourself, be nice, don't ask overly personal que
335.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
True, however: 1. A single bus represents dozens of cars that would otherwise be on the highway in the case that all passengers previously had car based commutes. 2. As long as the average speed is greater than or equal to the car it would
336.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
Sure, but by that logic, why not extend rapid transit -- it's far more traveled than all of the commuter rail lines combined.
337.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
Heh, this pretty much summarizes it: https://i.reddituploads.com/ed7d8ee6c6b84fe2b1ad51aab4e29588...
338.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
It's not bad. EMUs are a net-new capex, though.
339.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
I'd say my argument is that rail based transport is inherently flawed given the politics surrounding funding its maintenance. Using the highway is better and more politically digestible, IMO. 1. Buses would encourage better maintenance
340.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
Given that the MBTA is a money losing organization I'm not sure revenue maximization is necessarily the strategy that should be sought.
341.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
Sure, but why should the MBTA care about the Providence Line in particular, as opposed to say, Worcester or other parts of Massachusetts?
342.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
I'm 100% against new tracks being laid or any more capital expenditures to the MBTA (anyone who goes on the Red Line during rush hour, or the commuter rail during the winter knows it sucks). The current system needs better maintenance,
343.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
What is the point then? Why not just stop targeting people in general?
344.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
It's not really frustrating, but just feedback. It's way more than 1% of the time. Type in best and try out the first 5 examples -- 40% of them are inaccurately reported. FWIW every service akin to this has the same issue.
345.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
honest feedback: the only thing with this, and most things like it is that it's not actually accurate. type in best -> see it's "available" -> go to namecheap -> see it is not unavailable. Once this happens onc
346.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
honest question: why is it OK if it's adult that's targeted but not OK if it's children? Literally any argument you apply to the latter applies to the former: 1. still developing -> adults technically are, too. 2. more nai
347.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
I don't get the point of these. Index funds win most of the time, and when they don't index funds still win once you count the amount of time and effort needed to marginally beat them. Set it and forget it.
348.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
Looks very interesting. One thing I've been wanting is a VM that would contain a "minimized" version of an operating system, plus a single program, in addition to the programs dependencies. I've looked into using Docker
349.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
Why don't you buy now? If may be worth $10,000 in the future. Though, it may also be worthless, too.
350.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
I disagree. What's valuable, and therefore compensation, is a matter of opinion, not fact.
351.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
Transparency aside, I've seen little evidence that employers can properly measure the exact value an employee adds to their organization. The reason for most of these problems lies there. If employers could solve that there wouldn'
352.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
> It's one company out of hundreds of thousands. > You did not address all of my criticisms of the article which are logically sound -- you only cherry-picked one emotional point. I'm not attempting to address whatever point
353.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
If the unemployment rate increased 3.6% tomorrow, I guess you wouldn't think it's a big deal, right? After all, it's not even 4%! The lack of sympathy people show these days. Sheesh.
354.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
It's always funny to me that instead of being angry, most people just say, "oh, well, they're not the only ones." What a world we live in. "Apple, Google and others colluded to suppress employee wages." >
355.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
1. If you know the teams you'd be on, pick the company with the team you prefer. 2. If you don't know the teams, just pick the better offer. They're very similar in a generalized sense.
356.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
This is not a fair comparison: 1.) The real cost for an Uber ride is opaque, at best. 2.) Unlike Uber, public transportation becomes exponentially better with infrastructure upgrades. These upgrades would cease (in both mind and in implemen
357.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
I believe capitalism works, however, "bad" actions are not properly punished. Case and point is the Equifax hacking which should have a company ending punishment, not a slap on the wrist. Once people and governments start punishin
358.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
Partnership. Literally everything in this world is easier with partners you can trust. Because of this I do everything with every others now. * Real Estate - Find people you want to live with and split the cost. Everyone wins. * Friendships
359.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
How can someone say that Level 5 driving without lidar is impossible? How exactly are humans driving then? Ridiculous. I'm still skeptical that it can be implemented successfully, though, given that we still don't have Level 5 wit
360.
▲
by
tabeth
9y ago
I imagine getting any security best practices (as defined by the employee) implemented to be as much as a political challenge as it is technical. With that said, most technical people don't want to be politicians.
More ›