ta8645

34 ms·

481.
by ta8645 3y ago
That makes sense. So it's okay for companies to advertise to NY citizens, for jobs in other states, without complying with this rule.
482.
by ta8645 3y ago
That seems unlikely, since they do not have legal jurisdiction over say a company in Belgium who is advertising worldwide for employees.
483.
by ta8645 3y ago
You're trying very hard to cling to your belief instead of just admitting, there's at least a chance, you're wrong.
484.
by ta8645 3y ago
Unless the client is compromised. The question becomes: do you trust Bitwarden and KeePass equally, to deliver an uncompromised client?
485.
by ta8645 3y ago
I just saw in an article, that while uncommon, mRNA vaccines can actually lead to circulating spike protein. From the article [1]: Most notably, the plasma of patients with postvaccine myocarditis had “markedly elevated levels” of free spi
486.
by ta8645 3y ago
I'm no intellectual giant, but I can't parse your original comment either. At the very least, it's more convoluted than necessary. The opposite of terrorism, I guess, is being helpful and kind? So you're saying that gi
487.
by ta8645 3y ago
And people play chess with computers, use Google Translate, etc. Doing so does not preclude the other. But that really isn't what is being discussed in this thread at all, which is simply whether computers will be able to perform this
488.
by ta8645 3y ago
> It’s certainly not going to write films and television most people are ever going to want to watch. Time will tell, but I think you're wrong. I've heard way too many people say "computers will never X" in my life,
489.
by ta8645 3y ago
> missing the key components of regulation and trust I thought that those are supposed to be the key components of crypto. You trust that it is regulated by mathematics, the market, and infrastructure, rather than relying on fiat.
490.
by ta8645 3y ago
It is fascinating to see how much misinformation was shared to the public by the MSM in this story. Long before the ills of social media were around to blame.
491.
by ta8645 3y ago
I would think that a good AI could actually point out missing and ambiguous information and allow an iterative process where a programmer could more easily fill in the blanks before resubmitting it for another round.
492.
by ta8645 3y ago
> ...the document is badly written. So it is just too embarrassing. At risk of being accused of being on the A.I. hype train, it seems like having a writing bot that could distill the important points out of poorly written documents, and
493.
by ta8645 3y ago
> I'm really tired of people acting like it's just a free market where everyone is an equal, rational actor. It's never been a free market. There was no golden age where everybody had access to public transit. There were
494.
by ta8645 3y ago
It's the same argument. Nobody forced you to pay for the bulbs, switches, bridges etc. For the record, I don't agree with it -- just saying.
495.
by ta8645 3y ago
People went places before cars were invented, you can too. Toyota offers you a better way, if you can afford to avail yourself of their offer -- that's all.
496.
by ta8645 3y ago
> How is this even legal is beyond me. It's the same argument as people who say Google should be allowed to censor whoever they want. "They're a private company, they can do whatever they want. Nobody is forcing you to u
497.
Batocera.linux – free retro-gaming distribution(batocera.org)
3 points by ta8645 3y ago|0 comments
498.
by ta8645 3y ago
We're not in the pub, and we're not drunk. We're adults and can discuss things without resorting to unjustified claims. At least that's my naive hope.
499.
by ta8645 3y ago
> I can equally make an argument that the relatively muted reaction of the Indophile UK government suggests that there is something to these reports: We can try to read the tea-leaves, but we don't know for sure. I'm not saying
500.
by ta8645 3y ago
You make some interesting, and good points; and that's perhaps reason to give some credence to the accusation. There are also some reasons to believe that the murdered victim, was not innocent of the charges levelled against him. But
501.
by ta8645 3y ago
> This is a very bold claim. I don't think so. The state visit, and the bad PR it brought to the Canadian PM is well-reported publically. And the idea that a PM makes political calculations, which don't hold truth as more impo
502.
by ta8645 3y ago
> The Indian response was more or less an admission. The only way you could read that response as an admission is if you've already made up your mind before reading it.
503.
by ta8645 3y ago
Even that article you cite stops short of saying that RAW was definitely the perpetrator. There are occasionally people who opportunistically claim credit for crimes they didn't commit, when it suits their politics. And even if it was
504.
by ta8645 3y ago
> In response, India had him assassinated. Why do people keep saying this like it's a fact? Often it's the same people claiming that the murdered victim in Canada should be presumed innocent of the accusations levelled at him
505.
by ta8645 3y ago
I appreciate his thoughtful analysis. These are thorny and complex issues. It's a bit odd that his prescription to avoid greater governmental control, is to employ greater governmental control over the internet. But he might be right
506.
by ta8645 3y ago
> I'd like just to say thanks for all the longstanding efforts of FSF and GNU. I'd like to extend your thanks, by explicitly thanking Richard Stallman for his important role in creating both those organizations. The man deserv
507.
by ta8645 3y ago
It's a political paper that helps reduce trust in science. The way that the non targeted areas were pure white, was clearly designed to accentuate an arbitrary point -- there is no purely scientific definition for "hotspot".
508.
by ta8645 3y ago
Hey, I like your site! Especially like the selection of fonts you linked, thanks. Also checked out the static site generator you linked to, and thought you might want to know that their website gives an error unless you include the "
509.
by ta8645 3y ago
I'm still using Twitter, and am still finding new sites, with content produced by interesting people. It doesn't seem as bad as people are making out, at least for my uses.
510.
by ta8645 3y ago
If Eve is listening in to the data stream you've outlined, it's trivial for her to decode. Adam: (A)93,036,637 Bob: (B)824,955,860,279 Eve: (B)824955860279 / (A)93036637 = Bob's secret of (S3)8867 Ada

More ›